[OSGeo-Conf] LOI Results

[Cameron Shorter]

I'd expect that both potential FOSS4G venues would be keen to hear 
feedback as to what was good or bad about their proposals from the 
voting committee, such that they can address this feedback in their 
final bid.

As such, I'd like to ask questions:
* Portland, Washington, would you appreciate such feedback made publicly 
available?

* Voters, would you be comfortable publicly summarising your thoughts 
about why you voted for one city or another?

* Voters, would it be more appropriate that one of us collate all our 
comments into one file, such that comments can't be linked back to one 
person?

On 24/05/13 23:13, Paul Ramsey wrote:
> Hello Portland and DC,
>
> The conference committee has submitted their LOI votes, and both
> Portland and Washington DC met the two vote threshold to move on to
> the bid stage.
>
> For the record, Portland received 2.5 votes and DC 3.5 (one member
> split hsr vote).
>
> The next deadline in the process is June 30, for bid submission.
>
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2014_Bid_Process
>
> Thanks everyone for participating, and to the committee for reviewing:
> with so many recusals, we need all your active participation in this
> year's process!
>
> Paul
> FOSS4G 2014 RFP Coordinator
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev


-- 
Cameron Shorter
Geospatial Solutions Manager
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254

Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
http://www.lisasoft.com