[OSGeo-Conf] [Board] FOSS4G Discount for Charter Members proposal
Andrew Ross
andrew.ross at eclipse.org
Tue Aug 26 10:54:18 PDT 2014
Thanks for the clarification Peter. For what it's worth, I agree that a
clearly defined mechanism makes a lot of sense.
On 26/08/14 12:08, Peter Baumann wrote:
> sorry, folks, that was not intended to go into this thread but another
> one. Now I see I have not been fast enough with ESC.
>
> OK, another attempt to say something meaningful:
> OSGeo might license its brand to conferences, and this allows them to
> send invoices even to universities. Secures OSGeo a fixed income,
> allowing LOCs to plan ahead.
>
> -Peter
>
>
>
> On 08/26/2014 05:42 PM, Andrew Ross wrote:
>> Sorry Peter, I'm not sure I understand your comment?
>>
>> On 26/08/14 11:22, Peter Baumann wrote:
>>> so back with universities :)
>>> -Peter
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/26/2014 05:16 PM, Andrew Ross wrote:
>>>> Very good point.
>>>>
>>>> A not-for-profit organizer may be a significant benefit and
>>>> simplify things quite a bit.
>>>>
>>>> A bunch more legal/fiscal issues emerge when you run events and
>>>> have to handle and transfer funds internationally. The number of
>>>> organizations who can handle this is fairly limited and those that
>>>> do so for a reasonable fee even more so. Continuity helps make it
>>>> worthwhile to figure this out in the first place and stay on top of
>>>> it as things change over time.
>>>>
>>>> On 26/08/14 10:59, Darrell Fuhriman wrote:
>>>>> Amen. We burned at least two months, maybe three, working that out.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think it’s actually really funny that the first piece of advice
>>>>> given to the LOC by OSGeo is “Find a conference organizer to help
>>>>> you.”
>>>>>
>>>>> If that’s the first piece of advice, then it seems pretty clear to
>>>>> me that OSGeo should just have a conference organizer on contract.
>>>>> The benefits of continuity from year to year would be enormous.
>>>>>
>>>>> d.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Aug 26, 2014, at 07:54, David William Bitner
>>>>> <bitner at dbspatial.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> And none of this even discusses the hassles that a grass roots
>>>>>> organizing group has with finding an entity to act as a fiscal
>>>>>> agent (aka deal with the money).
>>>>>>
>>
>
More information about the Conference_dev
mailing list