[OSGeo-Conf] [Board] On the creation of permanent OSGeo/FOSS4G CRM

Daniel Morissette dmorissette at mapgears.com
Fri Mar 28 03:55:14 PDT 2014

I agree with the idea in general, but please keep in mind before making 
this a mandatory rule that some conference organizers will have used 
their personal/internal list of contacts to seek sponsors the year that 
they organized the event and may not be willing or even able to share 
their contact list in an OSGeo CRM.

So I think that would have to be a strong recommendation rather than a 
hard rule.

My 0.02$


On 14-03-27 4:50 PM, Darrell Fuhriman wrote:
> One of things that has become apparent in going through the process of
> getting sponsorships for FOSS4G is that the current system is rather
> unwieldy. In fact, the use of the word “system” implies a type of order
> which does not exist.
> There are no designated contacts at each company, no consistent tracking
> of past sponsorships or expressions of interest, no tracking of
> non-functioning e-mails, or people who have left a company.
> In short, it’s a complete fucking disaster.
> This is a problem because:
> 1) FOSS4G is dependent on sponsorships to finish in the black
> 2) OSGeo is dependent on FOSS4G events (not just the big annual
> conference) for a large portion of its income
> 3) We should be making it easy, not hard, to keep FOSS4G/OSGeo solvent.
> We have individuals who have expressed an interest in getting all of the
> past and current data into a CRM so we can more easily track this in the
> future. However, unless there is a future for such a system, it’s
> probably not worth the non-trivial amount of effort it would take.
> Hence, I propose:
> The 2014 LOC will work to configure an instance of SugarCRM, including
> entering the data we have collected on current and past sponsorships.
> After the conclusion of FOSS4G 2014, OSGeo would agree to:
> 1) Move the SugarCRM instance to be hosted and maintained by OSGeo
> 2) Strongly encourage (mandate?) its use by future OSGeo affiliated
> conferences
> 3) Give access to other geospatial related events as appropriate
> I realize there is some reluctance to "give orders" to the people who
> have volunteered to do these events. However in the long run having a
> central CRM will /reduce/ the amount of work required by future LOCs,
> and by past ones who get requests to dig out contact information from
> events that occurred years ago.
> The use of a CRM could also be expanded to track contact information for
> all attendees including which events they’ve attended, so they can be
> contacted about future relevant events – another case where there is no
> coordination or sanity to any of the extant data.
> Thoughts?
> Darrell
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board

Daniel Morissette
T: +1 418-696-5056 #201
Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000

More information about the Conference_dev mailing list