[OSGeo-Conf] liability

[Bart van den Eijnden]

I fully agree.

I think we should relief the financial stress from the Korea LOC.

Of course given the theoretical case where an LOC would make a mess of things, we should not be liable ideally, but in the South-Korea case they are giving their full best and even more IMHO.

Does anyone have background on why this was chosen before? I can’t recall the discussions.

Best regards,
Bart

> On 18 Jun 2015, at 17:25, Darrell Fuhriman <darrell at garnix.org> wrote:
> 
> That is, to be blunt, absurd.
> 
> If OSGeo is getting the benefits of any proceeds, they need to be assuming the liability as well.
> 
> d.
> 
>> On Jun 18, 2015, at 08:20, 신상희 <shshin at gaia3d.com <mailto:shshin at gaia3d.com>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi all,
>> 
>> Currently all liability will be upon Seoul LOC not OSGeo as per requested by conference committee. That's why Seoul team is so sensitive to funding and financial issues.
>> 
>> Best,
>> Sanghee
>> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20150618/c1c90796/attachment.html>