[OSGeo-Conf] Looking for the keeper of the videos from FOSS4GNA- PDX (2014)

Andrew Ross andrew.ross at eclipse.org
Mon Sep 21 08:23:29 PDT 2015 

Dear Bob,

Some of this may be things you & others may already know.

The 15 minute limit is quickly waived if you ask for it & even 
automatically in a lot of cases. Google it & you'll see info about this.

For what it's worth, videos in YouTube can be shared trivially via. 
email or social media and embedded into any external site. This is very 
common and a good idea.

Additionally, in my opinion, within YouTube, it is best practice to 
complete meta data for the video (talk title, description) and tag the 
videos with keywords (project, topic, technology, event, etc.) This 
makes them a lot easier to find and relate to other talks shared by 
other people on the same topics.

Kind regards,

A

On 21/09/15 10:53, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) wrote:
> All,
>
> I like to think of these types of media as a Library of sorts.  And keeping them available is in the best interests of the community.  I have no way of calculating the benefits however.
>
> Back to Youtube uploading complication (as I see them), there are defaults like 15min length, etc.  Things that the average joe may have problems with as far as uploading something. The limit can be increased, but that would require a media lib rain of some sort to manage the account.
>
> Also, how would/could the process of indexing and binding to projects be best accomplished with YouTube?  Via an outside database, or??  I ask this now since it’s seems relevant if this topic leads to it’s logical conclusion of bringing media together into a single repository.
>
> bobb
>
>
>> On Sep 19, 2015, at 12:49 PM, Fenoy Gerald <gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr> wrote:
>>
>> David,
>> I personally feel that it is better to react than doing nothing,even if,as you said "the technology is moving fast", still many did so amazing work that we should keep trace of it …
>>
>> Nevertheless, I wonder if we can ask so much work to our so loved SAC community without expensing at least a small amount of money …Sorry I know I spoke too much about it during this week, but still … if our president deserve to have some income, SAC do deserve also !
>>
>> So what will be the next move exactly, if any ?
>>
>>> Le 20 sept. 2015 à 02:37, David Percy <percyd at pdx.edu> a écrit :
>>>
>>> It seems like we should have a permanent archive on our own servers, in addition to a public consumption interface like one of the services we have been discussing.
>>> This starts to get into a long term digital stewardship issue. We need to perhaps have a longer view... With content tags and stuff. But not so difficult that it becomes a task that is hard to manage, and therefore never gets done. Maybe a simple CMS... Aren't we using drupal already?
>>>
>>> Unless we think these talks are more ephemeral due to the rapidly changing technology.
>>>
>>> In which case we can leave the issue in the more ad hoc status that it is, and just let each LOC deal with it.
>>> Just a thought,
>>> Percy
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I don’t see $200/year of value in Vimeo. Surely we want our content to have the widest possible real, won’t that come through YouTube?
>>> ______
>>> Steven
>>>
>>>
>>>> On 19 Sep 2015, at 03:10, Andrew Ross <andrew.ross at eclipse.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Bob,
>>>>
>>>> They are creative commons licensed and downloading is trivial. Just landed returning from Seoul so I'll post how to do so tomorrow.
>>>>
>>>> Kind regards,
>>>>
>>>> A
>>>>
>>>> On September 18, 2015 5:43:49 PM EDT, "Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul)" <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> wrote:
>>>> Andrew,
>>>>
>>>> I have a problem with the YouTube License.  Once it’s up there, they get to use it however they want, forever.
>>>>
>>>> Also, I (still) don’t see a method for downloading anything for saving as a local copy from YouTube (at least not legally).
>>>>
>>>> Vimeo let’s you download/copy, and even pick who sees your content., etc.  I’ll be the first to admit though, that not everyone will care about this, until they do, and then it will be too late.
>>>>
>>>> bobb
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 18, 2015, at 2:52 PM, Andrew Ross <andrew.ross at eclipse.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> YouTube has a much bigger community, is free, and the search/indexing can't be beat.
>>>>>
>>>>> I like Vimeo, have used it a fair amount, but this is no contest.. YouTube wins imho.
>>>>>
>>>>> A
>>>>>
>>>>> On September 18, 2015 11:06:30 AM PDT, Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Is Vimeo preferred to YouTube? Why?
>>>>>
>>>>> Andrew Ross post 90+ 2013 videos on YouTube at zero cost
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards
>>>>> Steven
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> +44 (0) 7958 924101
>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>>>
>>>>> On 18 Sep 2015, at 18:57, Darrell Fuhriman <darrell at garnix.org> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Aww crap.
>>>>>
>>>>> Our vimeo pro account expired, and apparently that took some of the videos offline. I didn’t think that was going to happen — I guess I mis-read the consequences.
>>>>>
>>>>> FWIW, I think OSGeo should keep this account up and consolidate all the foss4g videos there (including the forthcoming 2015).
>>>>>
>>>>> Board: is this a service that OSGeo is willing to pay for? It’s $200/year.
>>>>>
>>>>> Darrell
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 18, 2015, at 10:11, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Edit . . .
>>>>>
>>>>> Oops, I mean just FOSS4G.   Looks like a few of the videos that were on Vimeo have gone missing, besides mine.  At least based on the links from here:  Maybe something has changed on Vimeo??
>>>>>
>>>>> http://2014.foss4g.org/schedule/sessions/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> bobb
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sep 18, 2015, at 11:47 AM, Basques, Bob (CI-StPaul) <bob.basques at ci.stpaul.mn.us> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> All,
>>>>>
>>>>> I’m looking for the Keeper of the conference videos from FOSS4GNA PDX (2014)
>>>>>
>>>>> I see a lot of them on Vimeo, but the one I did seems to be missing.  It used to be there.  Unless I’m using a
>>>>> bad search filter . . .
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>> bobb
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>>
>>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> David Percy ("Percy")
>>> -Geospatial Data Manager
>>> -Web Map Wrangler
>>> -GIS Instructor
>>> Portland State University
>>> -gisgeek.pdx.edu
>>> -geology.pdx.edu
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>>
>> Gérald Fenoy
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/User:Djay
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev

More information about the Conference_dev mailing list