[OSGeo-Conf] FOSS4G 2018 Decision Time

Tue Dec 6 12:43:47 PST 2016

let's move

+1

J
Dne 6.12.2016 v 03:26 Venka napsal(a):
> On 2016/12/06 4:32, David William Bitner wrote:
> > +1 to moving forward on the vote
>
> +1
>
> Venka
>
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 1:29 PM, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 11:23 AM, David Fawcett <david.fawcett at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>> I think that we can move on to voting, but I am OK with Steven's
> >> suggestion
> >>> of waiting until Wednesday.
> >>
> >> This was also the intent of my message; I support following Steven's
> >> suggested course of action.
> >>
> >> Eli
> >>
> >>>
> >>> David.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks Thomas
> >>>>
> >>>> Let’s wait until Wednesday in case anyone objects to my suggestion
> >>>> then
> >> I
> >>>> will confirm the voting procedure.
> >>>>
> >>>> Although I note the concerns expressed at the LoI stage voting being
> >> made
> >>>> public. I think it is important for the sake of transparency that
> >>>> we are
> >>>> open about the voting for or against the Dar proposal (open does not
> >> mean
> >>>> saying who voted, your anonymisation process worked well IMO)
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers and thanks for being our recording officer
> >>>> ______
> >>>> Steven
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 5 Dec 2016, at 15:40, thomas bonfort <thomas.bonfort at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I'm still available to run the election with the same rules as the
> >>>> first
> >>>> round, with the difference that I will privately email results to the
> >> voting
> >>>> members instead of the public list. Just let me know when to start.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Thomas
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 4:36 PM Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I don't need discussion time.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I prefer a vote with two options and would like “No to Dar es Salaam”
> >>>>> included as an option (or just change the question to "Should the
> >>>>> Conference Committee award FOSS4G 2018 to Dar es Salaam?" Yes/No).  I
> >>>>> guess I'm a stickler for formality which brings some bureaucracy.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> For whoever is going to run this vote, we might want to have a quick
> >>>>> list discussion to see that we're all on the same page for how it
> >>>>> will
> >>>>> run.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best regards, Eli
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 5:26 AM,  <till.adams at fossgis.de> wrote:
> >>>>>> +1 from me.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am 2016-12-05 14:14, schrieb Peter Batty:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I think we can move to the voting stage and your suggestions sound
> >>>>>>> good Steven.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Cheers,
> >>>>>>>  Peter.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Sent from my iPhone
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Dec 5, 2016, at 4:49 AM, Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com
> >> [3]>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Conference Committee Members
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The question period is now closed. I think the the Dar es Salaam
> >>>>>>>> team have answered the questions, it is for you to decide whether
> >>>>>>>> those answers are satisfactory.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> The selection process now allows for a period of discussion
> >>>>>>>> amongst
> >>>>>>>> the CC members (possibly an IRC) however given the small number of
> >>>>>>>> questions and a sole bidder I am not sure what would be gained
> >>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>> a further discussion. Can you respond within the next 48 hours if
> >>>>>>>> you wish to schedule a discussion, otherwise I will move on to the
> >>>>>>>> voting stage.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Re voting. I think that we should follow the process and hold a
> >> vote
> >>>>>>>> even though there is only one proposal for consideration. My
> >>>>>>>> suggestion is that we include a second option in the vote - “No to
> >>>>>>>> Dar es Salaam”. I am not in any way say suggesting that there is
> >>>>>>>> anything wrong with the Dar proposal or that I would vote against
> >> it
> >>>>>>>> but I am suggesting that in a secret ballot anyone who is opposed
> >> to
> >>>>>>>> the Dar proposal should have a way of registering that vote. In
> >>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>> event that the no vote exceeded the yes vote we would then
> >> recommend
> >>>>>>>> to the board that we recommence the selection process.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> If the CC view is that my suggestion is an unnecessary bit of
> >>>>>>>> bureaucracy then I will proceed in whatever way you suggest.
> >>>>>>>> Either
> >>>>>>>> way can you confirm your preference at the same time as indicating
> >>>>>>>> whether you want an IRC before voting.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Cheers and seasons greetings to you and yours
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ______
> >>>>>>>> Steven
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
> >>>>>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org [1]
> >>>>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev [2]
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Links:
> >>>>>>> ------
> >>>>>>> [1] mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>>>>> [2] http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> >>>>>>> [3] mailto:shfeldman at gmail.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
> >>>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
> >>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Conference_dev mailing list
> >>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Conference_dev mailing list
> >>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Conference_dev mailing list
> >>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Conference_dev mailing list
> >> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Conference_dev mailing list
> > Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev

-- 
Jachym Cepicky
e-mail: jachym.cepicky at gmail.com
twitter: @jachymc