[OSGeo-Conf] [Board] Fwd: [rfp 2019] extension of the proposal period by one week
Till Adams
till.adams at fossgis.de
Wed Nov 1 12:34:02 PDT 2017
Hi,
I thought, that the final approvement is done by the board, although it
is suggested to follow the proposal of the conf comm.
That was because I asked the board,
Till
Am 30.10.2017 um 04:09 schrieb Jody Garnett:
> If I understand your email - you are letting the board know about the
> change of schedule and reminding us that the board is asked to make a
> motion to recognize the resulting selection).
>
> (So similar to how the board recognized projects when they graduate
> incubation).
>
> I do not see any conflict for Maria and Vasile voting; the board does
> not have any say in the selection process.
>
> On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 7:52 AM Maria Antonia Brovelli
> <maria.brovelli at polimi.it <mailto:maria.brovelli at polimi.it>> wrote:
>
> I already voted as member of CC. I don't see reasons for voting as
> Board, as the two teams agreed on that decision.
>
> Best
>
> Maria
>
>
>
> Pay attention to this Special Issue and see if it is of interest
> by you:
>
> http://www.mdpi.com/journal/ijgi/special_issues/Geospatial_Big_Data_Urban_Studies
>
>
>
> *----------------------------------------------------*
> *Prof. Maria Antonia Brovelli*
> Professor of GIS and Remote Sensing
> Politecnico di Milano
> **
>
> ISPRS WG IV/4 "Collaborative crowdsourced cloud
> mapping (C3M)" http://www2.isprs.org/commissions/comm4/wg4.html, Board
> of Directors of OSGeo; GeoForAll Advisory Board; NASA WorldWind
> Europa Challenge; SIFET Advisory Board
>
>
> UN-GGIM Academic Network Deputy Chair, UN-GGIM Italy, UN OpenGIS
> Initiative (Chair of the Capacity Building WG)
>
>
> *SolKatzAward2015*
>
>
>
> P.zza Leonardo da Vinci, 32 - Building 3 - 20133 Milano (Italy)
>
> Tel. +39-02-23996242 -
> Mob.+39-328-0023867, maria.brovelli at polimi.it
> <mailto:maria.brovelli at polimi.it>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *Da:* Board <board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>> per conto di Michael Smith
> <michael.smith.erdc at gmail.com <mailto:michael.smith.erdc at gmail.com>>
> *Inviato:* domenica 29 ottobre 2017 13:02
> *A:* Till Adams; OSGeo Board
> *Cc:* conference
> *Oggetto:* Re: [Board] Fwd: [OSGeo-Conf] [rfp 2019] extension of
> the proposal period by one week
>
>
> Since the conference committee is all in favor of this, I see no
> issues, it has my support.
>
>
>
> If the rest of the board thinks this needs a vote, we can do that,
> but in my opinion, this is well within the scope for the
> conference committee to decide on its own.
>
>
>
> Mike
>
>
>
>
>
> Michael Smith
>
> OSGeo Foundation Treasurer
>
> Treasurer at osgeo.org <mailto:reasurer at osgeo.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Board <board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org>> on behalf of Till Adams
> <till.adams at fossgis.de <mailto:till.adams at fossgis.de>>
> *Date: *Sunday, October 29, 2017 at 8:00 AM
> *To: *OSGeo Board <board at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:board at lists.osgeo.org>>
> *Cc: *conference <conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>>
> *Subject: *[Board] Fwd: [OSGeo-Conf] [rfp 2019] extension of the
> proposal period by one week
>
>
>
> Dear OSGeo-Board,
>
> as both teams agreed, the conference committee extended the period
> for preparation of the proposals for FOSS4G2019. The new deadline
> for proposals now is the 4th of December, the q&a period lasts
> until 15th of December. After this the conference committee will
> vote on the proposals. See the corresponding emails below.
>
> We will send the official result to the Board on December 18. The
> procedure foresees that the Board will then vote on the Conference
> Committee's proposal. I would please you to consider to vote
> promptly after our vote, so that we are able to inform the teams
> before Christmas.
>
> Since Vasile and Maria represent both chairs of the respective
> LOCs on the board, I would suggest that both abstain from this
> vote, but of course this is matter of the Board, not mine.
>
> On behalf of the conference committee,
>
> Till
>
>
> -------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht --------
>
> *Betreff: *
>
>
>
> [OSGeo-Conf] [rfp 2019] extension of the proposal period by one week
>
> *Datum: *
>
>
>
> Sun, 29 Oct 2017 12:49:54 +0100
>
> *Von: *
>
>
>
> Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> <mailto:till.adams at fossgis.de>
>
> *An: *
>
>
>
> conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>, delawen at gmail.com
> <mailto:delawen at gmail.com>, Vasile Craciunescu
> <vasile at geo-spatial.org> <mailto:vasile at geo-spatial.org>
>
>
>
> Dear Conference Comittee, SLOC and BLOC!
>
> As the Spanish team and some of our committee members have agreed
> (and there have been no dissenting votes) I would like to announce
> that the time period for submitting the proposals for RfP2019 has
> been extended by one week. The new deadline for the proposals is
> now *4th of December*.
>
> I have changed the corresponding pages in the WIKI [1] and
> shortened the question phase by three days (until 15th of
> December). This allows the Board to approve the election of the
> Conference Committee before Christmas.
>
> ***Note for the voting members***
> !! Please note, that the final vote on the proposals takes place
> between 15th and 17th of December !!
> Be preapred and please vote, no matter where you are !!!
>
>
>
> Regards, Till
>
>
>
> [1] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2019_Bid_Process
>
>
>
> Am 27.10.2017 um 13:26 schrieb Till Adams:
>
> Maria,
>
> I am happy, that you agree (and to be honest, I expected that
> more or less ;-)).
>
> I do not want to support any kinds of "election campaigns"
> here, so I feel that I have to clarify up some things about
> your notice in the 2nd part of your email:
>
> The idea and the initiative for this extension are 100% based
> on my personal thoughts, nothing else. No one of BLOC asked me
> to do that, so there is no need to be surprised ;-).
> I just remembered the time when we @Bonn prepared our
> proposal. Although such a proposal is the sum of work of many
> people, in the end it was me to write major parts and that
> *might* be the same for SLOC and BLOC. I say *might* because I
> do not want to start any discussion on this here & now. I also
> think, that the internal organisation is a matter of the [_]LOCs.
>
> !! If this extension of the proposal period leaves any bland
> flavour, we shouldn't do it !!
>
> In general I am quite sure, that the Romanian and also the
> Spanish communties are big and well organized. My intention
> (and my job) is to guarantee a fair competition among the teams.
>
> Till
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Am 27.10.2017 um 12:28 schrieb María Arias de Reyna:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 12:05 PM, Till Adams
> <till.adams at fossgis.de <mailto:till.adams at fossgis.de>> wrote:
>
> Dear Conference Committee, dear Maria as representant
> of the Sevilla
> team (SLOC)!
>
> I think you all have seen, that Vasile, the CRO of the
> recently finished
> board votings had a lot TODO's around the voting
> procedure. Many of
> these time consuming issues couldn't be foreseen due
> to all the
> happenings around the voting period.
>
> The point is, that Vasile is also foreseen as chair of
> the Bucharest
> team for Rfp 2019 (BLOC). Having noticed all this, I
> asked Vasile, if he
> would agree me proposing to extent the proposal period
> for Rfp 2019 by
> one week. This to give especially him some more time
> to prepare the
> proposal without running into a hastle. Of course
> provided that SLOC agrees!
>
> I think it's only fair and we should give BLOC the
> chance to make a good
> proposal for a fair competition between SLOC and BLOC.
> In general that
> would mean, that all the dates mentioned on [1] would
> slip back a week,
> but we still would be able to present the location for
> 2019 by Christmas
> (if the board would find a date for their final
> decision). We also could
> shorten the question period by a few days, so the
> board has more options.
>
> So first I'd like to ask you Maria, as representant of
> SLOC, what your
> thoughts on this are? Can we agree on this proposal?
>
>
>
> Dear Till,
>
>
>
> What you say makes sense. It is on our best interest to
> have good proposals and if BLOC finds they need more time,
> I can't refuse. Whatever is needed to have the best FOSS4G.
>
>
>
> Although, I have to say, I am a bit surprised. I heard
> romanian community was stronger, not depending so much on
> Vasile (even if he is chair). At least for the Spanish
> community, we try to be horizontal and not depend on
> individuals.
>
>
>
>
> If SLOC agrees, I'd like to ask the voting members of
> CC for their
> statement (Just a question, but do we have to call for
> a vote, if SLOC
> agrees?)
>
> I wish you all a nice weekend!
>
> Till
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Conference_dev mailing list
>
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Board at lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>
> _______________________________________________
> Board mailing list
> Board at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Board at lists.osgeo.org>
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/board
>
> --
> --
> Jody Garnett
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20171101/e7d99062/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Conference_dev
mailing list