[OSGeo-Conf] [rfp 2019] is it possible to extent the proposal period by one week ?

[Eli Adam]

On Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 3:05 AM, Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> wrote:
> Dear Conference Committee, dear Maria as representant of the Sevilla
> team (SLOC)!
>
> I think you all have seen, that Vasile, the CRO of the recently finished
> board votings had a lot TODO's around the voting procedure. Many of
> these time consuming issues couldn't be foreseen due to all the
> happenings around the voting period.
>
> The point is, that Vasile is also foreseen as chair of the Bucharest
> team for Rfp 2019 (BLOC). Having noticed all this, I asked Vasile, if he
> would agree me proposing to extent the proposal period for Rfp 2019 by
> one week. This to give especially him some more time to prepare the
> proposal without running into a hastle. Of course provided that SLOC agrees!
>
> I think it's only fair and we should give BLOC the chance to make a good
> proposal for a fair competition between SLOC and BLOC. In general that
> would mean, that all the dates mentioned on [1] would slip back a week,
> but we still would be able to present the location for 2019 by Christmas
> (if the board would find a date for their final decision). We also could
> shorten the question period by a few days, so the board has more options.
>
> So first I'd like to ask you Maria, as representant of SLOC, what your
> thoughts on this are? Can we agree on this proposal?
>
> If SLOC agrees, I'd like to ask the voting members of CC for their
> statement (Just a question, but do we have to call for a vote, if SLOC
> agrees?)

I don't think that a vote is needed.  I think that this is within your
purview and particularly non-controversial with SLOC's agreement.


Best regards, Eli

>
> I wish you all a nice weekend!
>
> Till
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev