[OSGeo-Conf] LGBT in Tanzania

[María Arias de Reyna]

Hi,

At least, I would consider this as a factor: security.

I am used to not being able to travel freely everywhere, but maybe... Maybe
I shouldn't have to skip conferences because of this. What is more
important, getting the conference venue on sensitive places or having
everybody allowed to travel freely?

At least for Tanzania I plan to go, but I already assumed I am not going to
do any tourism or any walk around besides the hotel, airport and conference
venue. It's just going to be the conference, which is not as bad as it may
sound :) At least I "only" have to hide my body (as suggestions from
https://www.gov.uk/foreign-travel-advice/tanzania/local-laws-and-customs ),
which is going to be more difficult than you think. I am not used to hiding
arms and legs when there are hot temperatures :)

Anyway, this kind of advices are better if they are made by the conference
organization than if they are made by some embassy. It is not the same
travelling to a big city than travelling to a small town.


On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 9:03 AM, Bart van den Eijnden <bartvde at osgis.nl>
wrote:

> Shouldn't this be part of our selection criteria for the next conferences?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Bart
>
> On 19-02-18 22:48, María Arias de Reyna wrote:
>
> Thanks Mark, any further information will be very helpful :)
>
> El 19 feb. 2018 10:45 p. m., "Mark Iliffe" <markiliffe at gmail.com>
> escribió:
>
>> Hi Maria,
>>
>> Yes, it is partly. Our LOC is formalising a partnership with HOT
>> currently, as per an earlier email to the list, and this is our first topic
>> of discussion. With regard to the legislation, it is unfortunately a legacy
>> from the colonial times, as someone who had lived there for 6 years in a
>> vibrant international community, I am yet to see an instance where these
>> laws have been applied - however, I stress, this is my personal view.
>>
>> Our plan is to hold further consultations with the OSGEO LGBT+ community
>> and I have personally reached out to those in a  position of responsibility
>> within this intersection for further advice. I assisted HOT with drafting
>> their initial response [1] to this concern also.
>>
>> As the FOSS4G 2018 co-chair, I would welcome that people share their
>> concerns publicly, or if they wish, privately with myself. But on behalf of
>> the LOC, I stress that our stated vision in both our proposal and now,
>> through our website, is to the most inclusive FOSS4G that we can be. We, as
>> a LOC, are firmly committed to equality, regardless of sexual orientation,
>> gender, race, and creed. We want to provide the safest possible space at
>> this year's FOSS4G, setting this out in both our vision and Code of Conduct
>> [2].
>>
>> We will be discussing this in our weekly LOC meeting tomorrow and I will,
>> in due course, feedback to this list.
>>
>> Best,
>>
>> Mark Iliffe
>> 2018 FOSS4G Co-Chair
>>
>>
>> [1] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/2018-
>> February/014201.html
>> [2] http://2018.foss4g.org/code-of-conduct.html
>>
>> On 19 February 2018 at 16:00, María Arias de Reyna <delawen at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm following this conversation on HOT:
>>>
>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/hot/2018-February/014199.html
>>>
>>> Is this real? Do this year's organisation have a plan? Is it legacy
>>> deprecated laws or are they being applied? Do we have a problem with LGBT+
>>> next FOSS4G? Should we warn the community? Can we do something about it?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Maria.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Conference_dev mailing list
>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>>
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing listConference_dev at lists.osgeo.orghttps://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20180220/0349f323/attachment.html>