[OSGeo-Conf] some decisions in the pipe

[Eli Adam]

On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 3:33 AM, Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> wrote:
> Hi Conference comittee,
...
> 3. Bid process
> I do not know, how you felt in the last RfP. I had problems in comparing
> the two proposals, because one of them was very close to the draft we
> gave out and the Sevilla one was, let's say, "freely interpreted" ;-).
> I don't want to limit the teams' individual imagination, but perhaps it
> would be easier for comparing the proposals, if all proposals would have
> the same agenda. This also would save the teams from spending money on a
> marketing agency for layout things (I do not want to impute, that this
> happened in 2019, but this *might* happen in the future in order to put
> one proposal in a better light). I wil call for a vote on this issue
> soon as well.

On this topic, I don't think that it matters.  It is easier to compare
two proposals that are in a vary similar format.  And sticking to the
template format may indeed be an advantage.

Eli


>
>
> So far, have a nice day!
>
> Till
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev