[OSGeo-Conf] RfP Document for RfP 2021

Fri Sep 6 00:32:22 PDT 2019

no problem

thanks for your work

pá 6. 9. 2019 v 7:59 odesílatel Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> napsal:
>
> Jachym,
>
> I think I'll kick the call out now - and link to the old SVN. Let's wait
> for some more feedback by CC about the new repo and then we can switch
> over without hurry in the next weeks, okay?
>
>
> Many thanks for your initiative anyhow.
>
> Till ;-)
>
>
>
> Am 05.09.19 um 20:45 schrieb Jachym Cepicky:
> > so . my action is no longer required?
> >
> > čt 5. 9. 2019 v 19:24 odesílatel Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> napsal:
> >> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 9:52 AM Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> wrote:
> >>> Eli, @all,
> >>>
> >>> sry, I did not reply. Personnally I don't mind, as I have no big clue
> >>> about these repos - my development time was in times of SVN ... ;-)
> >>>
> >>> In general I agee, the repo must be open to pulic. If tht is not the
> >>> case ,we should stay with the old one. To be sure (I know I have access
> >>> somewhere) could you please upload the latest Rfp2021 doc into the ld SVN?
> >> You have commit rights to the SVN repo or if that isn't your OSGeo
> >> userid, I can add it.  Do any other Conference Committee members want
> >> commit rights for our SVN repo?
> >>
> >> In any case, I've added it.  Please check that things are all correct
> >> and as you want it.  https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/changeset/12765/ and
> >> https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/changeset/12766/ (rename files removing
> >> "draft")
> >>
> >>> We have to kick out the call by tomorrow.
> >> Let me know if you need anything else.  Feel free to use your own
> >> access as well.
> >>
> >> Thanks for putting this all together!
> >>
> >> Best regards, Eli
> >>
> >>> Thanks, Till
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am 05.09.19 um 17:06 schrieb Eli Adam:
> >>>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 12:23 AM Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> wrote:
> >>>>> Jachym,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I accepted the last small edits of Paul now, could you please load up
> >>>>> the RfP document [1] today and send me a message, that all is ready ;-) ?
> >>>> This new Gitea repo should be public and not private right?
> >>>>
> >>>> Till and others who is planning on directly making commits to the new
> >>>> repo?  I'm hoping that it will be at least a few people.
> >>>>
> >>>> Best regards, Eli
> >>>>
> >>>>> When you added it, could you also adapt the link to the document in [2],
> >>>>> I tzhink it makes sense to put the financial sheets also in the new
> >>>>> repo, can you also do that and alter the link?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Many thanks,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Till
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [1]
> >>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SUA7Kt6EEtLj6ZWSensMjFnMNxCamXe4jupmKN-O-kc
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [2] https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2021_Bid_Process -> chapter "RFP
> >>>>> Documents"
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Am 04.09.19 um 16:59 schrieb Eli Adam:
> >>>>>> This time resent to include the list.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 3:02 PM Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> wrote:
> >>>>>>> Hi all,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm somewhat indifferent on platform as long as SAC is supporting it
> >>>>>>> or it is otherwise reliable.  I've not kept up to date on OSGeo Gitea.
> >>>>>>> Which projects use this as their primary repo?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Mon, Sep 2, 2019 at 6:17 AM Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hi Till (and all the others),
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I suggest, we move from SVN to Gitea [1] One of the advantages is
> >>>>>>>> (except from - it's GIT!) is, that everybody with OSGeo UserID can
> >>>>>>>> acces
> >>>>>>> There is already a process to grant people SVN access,
> >>>>>>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Subversion#Add.2FRemove_Committer and I've
> >>>>>>> offered to give access to anyone (appropriate) who wants it.  I think
> >>>>>>> that Till already has rights here.  I'm also glad to make commits for
> >>>>>>> anyone as needed if they for some reason don't want to do it
> >>>>>>> themselves.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm not really in favor of change for the sake of change but if it
> >>>>>>> leads to more people contributing, I'm all for that!  Who would
> >>>>>>> contribute if we switch to Gitea?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This url, https://git.osgeo.org/gitea/conference-commitee/foss4g, 404s
> >>>>>>> for me.  If we go this route, will this be a publicly accessible url
> >>>>>>> where anyone can track the progress?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If SAC is supporting Gitea, other OSGeo projects use it as their
> >>>>>>> primary repo, additional people will/might contribute, and it provides
> >>>>>>> a publicly accessible url, then I'm all for switching.  Thanks for
> >>>>>>> suggesting this Jachym.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Best regards, Eli
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> ok?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> J
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> [1] https://git.osgeo.org/gitea
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> po 2. 9. 2019 v 15:14 odesílatel Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> napsal:
> >>>>>>>>> Hi CC,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I made a copy of last years RfP document here:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1SUA7Kt6EEtLj6ZWSensMjFnMNxCamXe4jupmKN-O-kc
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> and shared it with the same people, so you should be able to edit (if
> >>>>>>>>> not, please ask me). As we do not have much time left (the call will go
> >>>>>>>>> out this friday on 6th of September) and nobody clearly stated needs to
> >>>>>>>>> alter this document. so I regard it more or less as finished (@Guido: I
> >>>>>>>>> accepted most of your comments/changes from last year). Nevertheless,
> >>>>>>>>> please feel free to read and make minor changes, that improve the
> >>>>>>>>> quality of the document or add s.th. important, that we missed before.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Can someone with SVN access upload this document as Pdf on
> >>>>>>>>> https://svn.osgeo.org/osgeo/foss4g/rfp/2021/FOSS4G2021-request-for-proposal.pdf
> >>>>>>>>> (as linked here: https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2021_Bid_Process)
> >>>>>>>>> *before* this friday?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I think we do not need any changes on the budget template sheet.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> As CRO's I have agreed with Codrina and Arnulf, they will receive and
> >>>>>>>>> count your votes and inform me with the final results of the voting steps.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> So far & all the best, regards,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Till
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> Jachym Cepicky
> >>>>>>>> e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com
> >>>>>>>> URL: http://les-ejk.cz
> >>>>>>>> GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
> >>>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Conference_dev mailing list
> >>>>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> >>>>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> >
> >


-- 
Jachym Cepicky
e-mail: jachym.cepicky gmail com
URL: http://les-ejk.cz
GPG: http://les-ejk.cz/pgp/JachymCepicky.pgp