[OSGeo-Conf] number of pages and attachments
Steven Feldman
shfeldman at gmail.com
Tue Apr 13 08:44:00 PDT 2021
+1 to what Till said
Suggest the letters go into a separate appendix. Also a presentation is a great idea but my advice is to keep it high level
______
Steven
Unusual maps in strange places - mappery.org <http://mappery.org/>
Subscribe to my weekly “Maps in the Wild <http://eepurl.com/dKStT-/>” newsletter
> On 13 Apr 2021, at 16:05, Till Adams <till.adams at fossgis.de> wrote:
>
> Dear Luca,
>
> I think (and to me) the letters are to be counted extra, so don't worry.
>
> Also I think it is okay to add a presentation as appendix.
>
> Any other opinions on that?
>
> Till
>
>
> Am 13.04.21 um 06:54 schrieb Luca Delucchi:
>> Dear Conference Committee members,
>>
>> in the RFP there is written that the full proposal should not be more
>> than 50 pages. In this number should we consider also the Letter of
>> endorsement?
>> because we already received 15 letters and others should arrive in this days
>>
>> Perhaps, in addition to the pdf document, we would like to add a
>> presentation, is that possible?
>>
>> Thanks a lot
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20210413/b3bad607/attachment.html>
More information about the Conference_dev
mailing list