[OSGeo-Conf] RfP FOSS4G2023

[Eli Adam]

+1 Eli

In my voting, I will probably prefer keeping the rotation to North America
in 2023; proposals otherwise being equal.

Best regards, Eli

On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 11:16 AM Msilikale Msilanga <
msilikalemsilanga at gmail.com> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
>
>
> *From: *Conference_dev <conference_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on behalf
> of Vasile Craciunescu <vasile at geo-spatial.org>
> *Date: *Tuesday, 14. December 2021 at 4.31 PM
> *To: *conference_dev <conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Subject: *[OSGeo-Conf] RfP FOSS4G2023
>
> Dear all,
>
> It's time to announce our request for proposals to host FOSS4G2023.
> Because of the pandemic situation, the 2022 call was open for both Europe
> and North America. Because the context didn't improve too much and because
> of all the related uncertainties, my proposal is to allow the countries
> from all continents to participate in this bid. This will increase our
> chances to have a strong participation. To have a quick decision on  that,
> I'm making a motion on this topic and I also vote + 1 for having FOSS4G2023
> RfP open for all the globe. Please cast your vote for the motion in the
> next three days. Of course, discussions are also open and encouraged.
>
> Warm regards,
> Vasile
> Conference Committee Co-Chair
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20211214/5ca138ce/attachment.html>