[OSGeo-Conf] Poll: Change FOSS4G structure to have some continuity of organization and management

[María Arias de Reyna]

2, clearly to me

El jue., 3 feb. 2022 15:04, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> escribió:

> Hi all (particularly voting committee members),
>
> The current FOSS4G structure has a new LOC every year starting more or
> less from scratch (some things like mailing lists and seed money are passed
> on).  Over the years, many people have commented on the load of work this
> creates for the LOC, the general inefficiency, the risk, and the burnout.
>
> If you consider yourself a voting member of the committee (
> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Committee#Current_Members), please
> indicate your preference on this.
>
> This is an informal poll to see if the conference committee wants to:
> 1. Keep it the way it is and not change anything
> 2. Change the FOSS4G organizing structure to something else (discussion of
> what we change it to can come later if people want to pursue this).
>
> As I've expressed several times, I prefer option 2, changing the FOSS4G
> organizing structure.
>
> Thanks for your time and participation.
>
> Best regards, Eli
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20220203/568d6533/attachment.html>