[OSGeo-Conf] Poll: Change FOSS4G structure to have some continuity of organization and management

[Guido Stein]

+2

On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 12:15 PM Darrell Fuhriman <darrell at garnix.org> wrote:

> I couldn't agree more. 2 is clearly the best path to long term
> sustainability.
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 8:29 AM Jonathan Neufeld <jneufeld at tecterra.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I’m not sure I qualify as a voting member, but after our experience with
>> 2020 in Calgary I support #2 – Changing the organizing structure.
>>
>>
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Jon
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Conference_dev <conference_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> *On
>> Behalf Of *María Arias de Reyna
>> *Sent:* Thursday, February 3, 2022 9:15 AM
>> *To:* Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>
>> *Cc:* OSGeo-Conf <conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>> *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Conf] Poll: Change FOSS4G structure to have some
>> continuity of organization and management
>>
>>
>>
>> 2, clearly to me
>>
>>
>>
>> El jue., 3 feb. 2022 15:04, Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us> escribió:
>>
>> Hi all (particularly voting committee members),
>>
>>
>>
>> The current FOSS4G structure has a new LOC every year starting more or
>> less from scratch (some things like mailing lists and seed money are passed
>> on).  Over the years, many people have commented on the load of work this
>> creates for the LOC, the general inefficiency, the risk, and the burnout.
>>
>>
>>
>> If you consider yourself a voting member of the committee (
>> https://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Conference_Committee#Current_Members),
>> please indicate your preference on this.
>>
>>
>>
>> This is an informal poll to see if the conference committee wants to:
>>
>> 1. Keep it the way it is and not change anything
>>
>> 2. Change the FOSS4G organizing structure to something else (discussion
>> of what we change it to can come later if people want to pursue this).
>>
>>
>>
>> As I've expressed several times, I prefer option 2, changing the FOSS4G
>> organizing structure.
>>
>>
>>
>> Thanks for your time and participation.
>>
>>
>>
>> Best regards, Eli
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Conference_dev mailing list
>> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20220203/8a65e49c/attachment.html>