[OSGeo-Conf] Announcement: Call for Location global FOSS4G 2023

[adams at osgeo.org]

I totally agree. Extending and hope ...

Till

Am 14.02.22 um 23:18 schrieb Maria Antonia Brovelli:
> Extending the call seems the only solution.I'm in favour of it.
> Best
> Maria
>
> Scarica Outlook per Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> *From:* Conference_dev <conference_dev-bounces at lists.osgeo.org> on
> behalf of Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>
> *Sent:* Monday, February 14, 2022 10:12:19 PM
> *To:* Guido Stein <guido at guidostein.com>
> *Cc:* OSGeo-Conf <conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
> *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Conf] Announcement: Call for Location global
> FOSS4G 2023
>  
> I think that is up to Vasile and Msilikale as co-chairs and running
> the RFP.  Anyone running the RFP has wide latitude to facilitate the
> process.  There was some input from a few of us.  
>
> Best regards, Eli
>
> On Mon, Feb 14, 2022 at 11:59 AM Guido Stein <guido at guidostein.com
> <mailto:guido at guidostein.com>> wrote:
>
>     Has there been a decision about extending the call?
>
>     On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 8:59 AM Eli Adam <eadam at co.lincoln.or.us
>     <mailto:eadam at co.lincoln.or.us>> wrote:
>
>         This is not the first time that we've received no LOIs or
>         extended the call:
>         https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/2011-July/001285.html
>         <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/2011-July/001285.html>
>         https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/2015-September/003296.html
>         <https://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/2015-September/003296.html>
>
>         Best regards, Eli
>
>         On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 12:14 AM María Arias de Reyna
>         <delawen at gmail.com <mailto:delawen at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>             On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 9:01 AM Luca Delucchi
>             <lucadeluge at gmail.com <mailto:lucadeluge at gmail.com>> wrote:
>             >
>             > Without proposals, an online version is the only way I
>             can see.
>
>             Even then, an online version needs a team behind it. A
>             team we right
>             now don't have.
>             _______________________________________________
>             Conference_dev mailing list
>             Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>             <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>             https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>             <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev>
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         Conference_dev mailing list
>         Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
>         <mailto:Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org>
>         https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
>         <https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Conference_dev mailing list
> Conference_dev at lists.osgeo.org
> https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/conference_dev/attachments/20220217/7efff741/attachment.html>