<html xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40"><head><meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=utf-8"><meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)"><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:Gulim;
panose-1:2 11 6 0 0 1 1 1 1 1;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Malgun Gothic";
panose-1:2 11 5 3 2 0 0 2 0 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:"Malgun Gothic";}
@font-face
{font-family:Gulim;
panose-1:2 11 6 0 0 1 1 1 1 1;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
text-align:justify;
text-justify:inter-ideograph;
text-autospace:none;
word-break:break-hangul;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"맑은 고딕",sans-serif;}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:#954F72;
text-decoration:underline;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
/* Page Definitions */
@page WordSection1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:3.0cm 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style></head><body lang=KO link=blue vlink="#954F72"><div class=WordSection1><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Hi all, </span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Steven and Maria raised good points. How about compromising this by not releasing the results at 1<sup>st</sup> stage and publishing the votes number at final stage. I believe 1<sup>st</sup> stage is just qualifying stage and announcing any team will proceed to 2<sup>nd</sup> stage is enough without mentioning specific vote numbers at the 1<sup>st</sup> stage. </span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Cheers, </span></p><p class=MsoNormal>신상희<span lang=EN-US><br>---<br>Shin, Sanghee<br>Gaia3D, Inc. - The GeoSpatial Company<br>http://www.gaia3d.com </span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"굴림",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><div style='mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid #E1E1E1 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm'><p class=MsoNormal style='border:none;padding:0cm'><b>보낸 사람<span lang=EN-US>: </span></b><span lang=EN-US><a href="mailto:delawen@gmail.com">María Arias de Reyna</a><br></span><b>보낸 날짜<span lang=EN-US>: </span></b><span lang=EN-US>2017</span>년<span lang=EN-US> 9</span>월<span lang=EN-US> 4</span>일 월요일 오후<span lang=EN-US> 11:45<br></span><b>받는 사람<span lang=EN-US>: </span></b><span lang=EN-US><a href="mailto:shfeldman@gmail.com">stevenfeldman</a><br></span><b>참조<span lang=EN-US>: </span></b><span lang=EN-US><a href="mailto:conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org">conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org</a><br></span><b>제목<span lang=EN-US>: </span></b><span lang=EN-US>Re: [OSGeo-Conf] Start 2019 RFP / Call for vote on "publishingLoIvotes"</span></p></div><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"굴림",sans-serif'><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>On Mon, Sep 4, 2017 at 4:39 PM, stevenfeldman <shfeldman@gmail.com> wrote:</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>> Sanghee said "Me too. +1 for not disclosing the vote numbers at any stage. "</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>> My suggestion to publish LoI votes was based on the very low threshold for</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>> inclusion in the next stage. If an LoI only needs 2 votes to go on to the</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>> next stage we may be putting a team to a lot of work in preparing a full</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>> proposal when they have little chance of being successful, hence my</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>> suggestion.</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Why little chance? A proposal may not seem good until it has been</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>fully described in detail. Not everyone is fluent in English, not</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>everyone is good at showing their ideas. Personally (as an interested</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>party this year) I don't care how many votes receive each proposal, as</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>all of them should try as hard as they could to get the better</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>proposal. In fact, I think no one should be discarded on the first</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>phase unless their first draft is so awful it is clear they cannot</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>work on a good proposal.</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>_______________________________________________</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Conference_dev mailing list</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>Conference_dev@lists.osgeo.org</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US>https://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/conference_dev</span></p><p class=MsoNormal><span lang=EN-US><o:p> </o:p></span></p></div></body></html>