[OSGeo-Discuss] Ballot: OSGeo Logo Contest Voting
tylermitchell at shaw.ca
Fri Apr 28 21:26:50 PDT 2006
On Friday 28 April 2006 09:02, Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> I believe the Web
> Committee will be doing a finishing and refinement on the selected logo and
> feedback here from Allan and others can be helpful to the web committee in
> that process.
> It isn't necessarily the case that the selected logo will be used exactly
> as originally presented.
First off - great work logo designers! I admire your willingness to stick
your neck out with your designs. I may claim to be too busy or not talented
enough, but in fact I'm just too chicken to do something crazy like that ;)
I really hope that refinements can happen with the help of the Web Committee,
other members and maybe even with some professional advice i.e. from a
third-party designer. Wouldn't that be great if we could swing something
Either way, I'm confident that we can all help the resulting logo improve
enough to be proud of, if improvements are generally thought to be necessary.
I'm also sure that as we start to use the logo in our own ways, on documents,
banners, websites, etc. - we will find areas that need improving - regardless
of how many iterations they may have gone through.
Again, thanks a lot guys for submitting logos.
p.s. Is it just me or does Aaron's RTF document not come across as valid rich
text? At least my install of KWord doesn't like it. It's a binary file, but
in my text editor I was still able to read his descriptions of the logo which
was helpful. Perhaps it got stored in a Word doc format by accident?
More information about the Discuss