[OSGeo-Board] RE: [OSGeo-Discuss]RE: [OSGeo-Board] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo: Taking stock of OSGeo after six months

[Gary Lang]

Good. That's why I asked. If we didn't react, we aren't listening.

I will check out that project.

Gary


-----Original Message-----
From:	Shorter, Cameron [mailto:cameron.shorter at adi-limited.com]
Sent:	Wed 8/16/2006 5:51 PM
To:	discuss at mail.osgeo.org
Cc:	board at board.osgeo.org
Subject:	[OSGeo-Board] RE: [OSGeo-Discuss]RE: [OSGeo-Board] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo: Taking stock of OSGeo after six months


> A further question. I am intrigued by SeanG's post on 
> incubation. I think it makes sense. Has this come up in these 
> discussions?

SeanG's comments triggered some detailed discussion which resulted in
actions to change our incubator process (and corresponding documentation).

I see this as evidence that OSGeo has a healthy, self correcting community.


DISCLAIMER:---------------------------------------------------------------------------
This Email may contain confidential and/or privileged information and is intended 
solely for the addressee(s) named. If you have received this information in error, or
are advised that you have been posted this Email by accident, please notify the 
sender by return Email, do not redistribute it, delete the Email and keep no copies.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: board-unsubscribe at board.osgeo.org
For additional commands, e-mail: board-help at board.osgeo.org



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20060816/2c7c4112/attachment-0001.html>