[OSGeo-Discuss] Board and Representational tasks
Daniel Morissette
dmorissette at mapgears.com
Fri Aug 17 08:51:36 PDT 2007
Tim,
I'm in agreement with most of your comments except this one:
Tim Bowden wrote:
> Personally I think charter membership should be
> opened up to anyone who who wants to apply and can find an existing
> member or two to second their application. I realise part of the
> rationale for the current structure was to avoid the organisation being
> hijacked, but it would seem that OSGeo has a healthy enough community
> that the risk of that is practically non-existent. In the (very)
> unlikely event that happened, the exodus of projects, members and
> sponsors from the org would make it nothing but a hollow meaningless
> shell worth nothing to the hijackers.
>
If all the hijacker wants is to see OSGeo's coordinated efforts fall
apart then the "exodus of projects, members and sponsors" would give
them exactly what they wanted.
I think the current system of charter membership is a necessary
protection that OSGeo needs to maintain, even if it's not perfect.
Daniel
--
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/
More information about the Discuss
mailing list