[OSGeo-Discuss] Supporting new projects

Cameron Shorter cameron.shorter at gmail.com
Tue Oct 2 19:30:06 PDT 2007


Yes,
There should be clear separation to the casual visitor between Endorsed, 
Quality OSGeo projects and Labs.

Bruce.Bannerman at dpi.vic.gov.au wrote:
>
> IMO:
>
>
> I'd caution against watering down the OSGeo 'brand' as a source of 
> 'quality' products, particularly if we want the products accepted as a 
> viable alternative within larger organisations.
>
> While it is good to provide pointers to projects of interest, there 
> needs to be a clear separation of what is an OSGeo project and what is 
> not. I think that it is acceptable to have certain hurdles that a 
> project has to pass in order to be accepted into the OSGeo fold.
>
> From memory, the structure of OSGeo has been based on the Apache 
> Foundation. This approach has worked well for that community. I 
> wouldn't like to see the approach watered down for OSGeo.
>
> Bruce
>
>
>
> discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org wrote on 03/10/2007 06:35:22 AM:
>
> > I'm +1 for OSGeo Labs. It would be a good holding place for projects
> > waiting to go into incubation and for new projects to meet and
> > collaborate with each other.
> >
> > The key elements of OSGeo Labs are:
> > 1. Labs draws minimal overhead from the OSGeo community. Ie, provide
> > hosting, but not mentoring.
> > 2. There is an entrance criteria list for OSGeo Labs which ensures that
> > the project has a goal of becoming an incubation OSGeo project and
> > therefore should be Open Source, Geospatial, etc.
> > 3. The decision for accepting a project into Labs should be 
> delegated to
> > a committee (which should be one person but could be more). Aim is to
> > keep the management overhead low.
> > 4. OSGeo Board reserves the right to remove projects from Labs if the
> > project dies or is not following OSGeo values.
> >
> > I suggest that OSGeo Incubation Committee hold a meeting to vote on 
> this.
> > Do we have a volunteer to draft the first version of "Entrance Criteria
> > and Guidelines for OSGeo Labs"? You should be able to draw a lot from
> > the Incubation process.
> >
>
>
>
> Notice:
> This email and any attachments may contain information that is 
> personal, confidential,
> legally privileged and/or copyright. No part of it should be 
> reproduced, adapted or communicated without the prior written consent 
> of the copyright owner.
>
> It is the responsibility of the recipient to check for and remove viruses.
>
> If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by 
> return email, delete it from your system and destroy any copies. You 
> are not authorised to use, communicate or rely on the information 
> contained in this email.
>
> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>   


-- 
Cameron Shorter
Systems Architect, http://lisasoft.com.au
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254




More information about the Discuss mailing list