[OSGeo-Discuss] Can I do the same GIS tasks with OS (as with ESRI)?
George R. C. Silva
georger.silva at gmail.com
Thu Apr 24 14:55:27 PDT 2008
Im a real novice in the OS world, and i´m enjoying. I´m liking what i see!
ESRI has good software, but the world of OS is just great and i love the
flexibility i have.
One thing GIS OS software could have are better editing tools. I do miss
them alot, and the one is ArcGIS are unbeatable (i dont know any O.S.
software that have 'autocomplete polygon', tons of snapping options, etc
- btw, if you do, let me know).
FOSS is great, but it lacks (IMHO) better editing options.
2cents
George Silva
David William Bitner escreveu:
> I would agree with Paul. The biggest hole in the FOSS stack is in
> easy, high quality printed map production. This is the one task where
> the Arc tools beat anything I have seen in FOSS GIS hands down.
>
> David
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 3:36 PM, Paul Ramsey
> <pramsey at cleverelephant.ca <mailto:pramsey at cleverelephant.ca>> wrote:
>
> I'd buck up for a copy of ArcView (much cheaper than ArcGIS), and use
> GRASS / PostGIS / etc tools for things like analysis. You can use
> ArcView to generate the paper and do some quick low-end analytics and
> the other tools for more involved stuff.
>
> My general synopsis: for server-side, for scriptability, for
> automation, for web-based, open source wins for most use cases, given
> a technically savvy user; for ad hoc, for cartographic production, for
> a user who is used to a point-n-click experience end to end,
> proprietary still wins.
>
> This equation hasn't changed much in the 10 years I've been running
> it. The goal posts have moved, open source is better at adhoc now than
> before, but still not at the level of ESRI, and ESRI is better at the
> server stuff now, but still not at the level of open source.
>
> P.
>
> On Thu, Apr 24, 2008 at 12:41 PM, Jennifer Horsman
> <jen at jencarta.com <mailto:jen at jencarta.com>> wrote:
> > The thread that was started today with the subject "Your open
> source career"
> > got me thinking about asking a question that has been rolling
> around in my
> > head. This is pointed at those people who have experience with
> ESRI products
> > as well as OS GIS products.
> >
> > I have been a long-time user of ESRI products, but I want to
> start my own
> > contract business and will not be able to afford the license for
> > ArcGIS/ArcInfo. So I recently set up a Linux box with GRASS
> installed, but
> > it has been over 10 years since I have used GRASS (it has
> probably changed
> > since then too!)
> >
> > Does GRASS have the same analysis and display capabilities as
> ArcGIS? I
> > know this is a very general question, so perhaps another
> question would be
> > where does GRASS fall short and where does it excel in
> comparison to the
> > ESRI products?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jennifer
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org <mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
>
> --
> ************************************
> David William Bitner
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list