[OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
JMFee at tecinc.com
Wed Feb 13 17:45:03 EST 2008
I've tried to push folks blogging to step out behind their handles and
put their names out there. I think an OSGeo Planet that were to mimic
the Planet Gnome would be a super idea. I've not pushed the issue as
I've tried to be as open as possible with Planet Geospatial, but if I
were to create a more specific planet, I would "require" real name and
possibly even photos. I think that adds so much credibility to the
community than all the handles that folks seem to use.
Setting up a planet is very easy (Use Venus, not Planet) but feel free
to consider me a resource as to what I've learned and struggled on over
the years with Planet Geospatial. I spend almost no time managing it
beyond cleaning out old feeds (probably not an issue with Planet OSGeo)
and adding new feeds (hopefully there a lot of folks wanting to blog
From: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Mateusz Loskot
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 3:03 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Planet OSGeo
Fawcett, David wrote:
> I personally like reading the OS bloggers mixed in with the
> bloggers along with the bloggers who write about using tools from both
> camps, all at planetgs.com.
Yup, planetgs.com does a great job and James Fee is a pioneer in
gathering geospatial people from both worlds in common place.
However, my personal feeling is that there is a lot or too much of
anonymity on the Planet Geospatial, but communities are not formed by
When I look at the list of aggregated blogs, I hardly can identify
who is hiding behind all those names.
If you check the list of members of
you see *only* and *real* names of people.
IMHO, this is a very important difference for how community is
visible to the world.
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
More information about the Discuss