[OSGeo-Discuss] OS Spatial environment 'sizing' + Image Management

[Bruce.Bannerman at dpi.vic.gov.au]

IMO:

Thanks for the comments Michael,

I was wondering if you'd contribute    ;-)



(Also, note that "wavelet" does
> not necessarily imply "lossy" anymore, as many assume.  Story of my
> life.)
> 


Can you point me to any studies to support the claim that JPEG2000 can 
indeed be indeed non-lossy?


I've seen the claims over the years, but nothing to support it (not that 
I've actively gone looking for the info, as I haven't had the need).


Bruce








Notice:
This email and any attachments may contain information that is personal, 
confidential, legally privileged and/or copyright.No part of it should be reproduced, 
adapted or communicated without the prior written consent of the copyright owner. 

It is the responsibility of the recipient to check for and remove viruses.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email, delete 
it from your system and destroy any copies. You are not authorised to use, communicate or rely on the information 
contained in this email.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20080221/77fcf68c/attachment-0002.html>