[OSGeo-Discuss] Re: Sign the Hague declaration

[Bruce.Bannerman at dpi.vic.gov.au]

IMO:


Good points Michael.



> I'm not looking to start a debate, but...


ditto. (perhaps I should stay out of this...)


> 
> >> We call on all governments to:
> >>
> >>   1. Procure only information technology that implements free and
> open standards;


This is desirable, however consider:

There is often existing proprietary technology in use that meets the 
requirements of a business. There may have been a significant investment 
over a large period of time to implement and use this technology. The 
business unit may not have achieved its return on investment. There may 
also have been a significant investment in training end users in this 
product range. Another consideration is the availability of trained users 
and consultants within industry. Another is the overhead in data 
conversion of significant repositories, and the potential for lost context 
during the conversion process (e.g. topology).


Considering the above, it may not be realistic to expect this to occur 
quickly.

This is something that needs to be phased in strategically over time, if 
it makes sense to do so.



>From my viewpoint it is more important to make sure that data maintained 
within these 'proprietary systems' is able to be freely shared using open 
standards. This can be implemented parallel to the proprietary systems. 

In time systems can be converted when investment decisions allow and 
business functionality is met.




> >>   2. Deliver e-government services based exclusively on free and open
> standards;

This another of those 'holy war' issues that never seem to go away and 
flair up from time to time.

Not all countries, or even government organisations within countries have 
the same liberal approaches to free and open access to data that the US 
and Canada do.

Many organisations still have their budgets tied to sales of 'licenses' to 
their data. There are also security issues for some countries.

We can have open access to data as a goal, but don't expect overnight 
success.


Also there is a significant demand for governments to provide data in 
someone's favourite format, so that they don't have to do the conversion 
into 'their' spatial tool.



> >>   3. Use only free and open digital standards in their own
> activities.
> >>

Again desirable.
 
My comments to point 1 above are also relevent here.




Bruce Bannerman





Notice:
This email and any attachments may contain information that is personal, 
confidential, legally privileged and/or copyright.No part of it should be reproduced, 
adapted or communicated without the prior written consent of the copyright owner. 

It is the responsibility of the recipient to check for and remove viruses.
If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender by return email, delete 
it from your system and destroy any copies. You are not authorised to use, communicate or rely on the information 
contained in this email.

Please consider the environment before printing this email.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20080515/19b293ca/attachment-0002.html>