[OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source Lurkers
lblake at ksninc.com
Fri Aug 21 12:18:57 PDT 2009
Thank you for your comments Christopher. I may just try my mailing list
invitation, and will let you guys know how it works out.
If there are other ideas on outreach of this type, I would like to hear
I think the ultimate success of my favorite little GIS program may
depend on the results of this outreach.
Office Phone Number: (209) 946-0268
Cell Phone Number: (209) 992-0658
From: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
[mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Christopher
Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 12:16 PM
To: OSGeo Discussions
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open Source Lurkers
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 11:55:30AM -0700, Landon Blake wrote:
> Is OpenJUMP the only community with these open source lurkers?
> How many of these companies do you think there are? (I'm not talking
> one guy who downloads an open source app and uses it. I'm talking
> actual companies with more than one employee.)
The majority. I figure it's approximately equal to the iceberg effect:
Unless you are a consultant advertising your services far and wide, my
guess is that for every one company you see participating openly in an
Open Source project, there are probably about 9 that are using the
software without you having any clue.
> Why don't they get more involved?
* No need: When Open Source solves the problem, you don't need to get
* No time: We'd love to participate more, but we've got our own
problems to solve -- and they don't match those of the community.
* No understanding: We download this software just like all of our
other software. What's a mailing list?
* Not enough encouragement. Gtting started in an open source project
can be a daunting task even for the well-educated in the open source
world; for those who aren't, it's an order of magnitude more
> Are they embarrassed? Do they not want
> their competition to find out about the open source program they are
> benefiting from? Are they violating the terms of the license and don't
> want to get busted?
I think these are generally unlikely.
> Do they not understand that their involvement is a
> key part of the program's survival?
It is likely they do not, in my opinoin; and in this, they may well be
right. The software existed before they started using it; it is likely
it will exist in some form afterwards as well.
> This has become an important question for me recently as the active
> development of OpenJUMP has slowed. We don't have any organizations
> actively participating in development. (Well, maybe one or two, but
> have been quiet lately.) I'm the only one working on serious
> improvements or changes, and not just bug fixes. I would really like
> reach out to these lurkers to get them more involved. Ultimately, the
> survival of the project may depend on it.
See also: OpenLayers.
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
Information provided via electronic media is not guaranteed against defects including translation and transmission errors. If the reader is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the sender immediately.
More information about the Discuss