RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open File FormatsandProprietaryAlgorithms[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
Lucena, Ivan
ivan.lucena at pmldnet.com
Sat Aug 22 06:43:05 PDT 2009
That is great. Thanks!
-isl
> -------Original Message-------
> From: Michael P. Gerlek <mpg at lizardtech.com>
> Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open File FormatsandProprietaryAlgorithms[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
> Sent: Aug 21 '09 13:59
>
> Yes, JP2 supports signed and unsigned types of up to ~24 bits. And lots of channels (bands). And alpha masking. And arbitrary metadata blobs (geospatial and otherwise).
>
> -mpg
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Lucena, Ivan
> Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 12:22 PM
> To: OSGeo Discussions; OSGeo Discussions
> Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open File FormatsandProprietaryAlgorithms[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
>
> But you can't compress data types other than byte in JPG. Can you do that in JP2K?
>
>
> > -------Original Message-------
> > From: Landon Blake <lblake at ksninc.com>
> > Subject: RE: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open File FormatsandProprietaryAlgorithms[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
> > Sent: Aug 21 '09 12:42
> >
> > Paul,
> >
> > I was wondering the same thing.
> >
> > It seems a little like choosing to drive a Honda Accord, or a Ferrari.
> > The Ferrari is a lot faster and comes with a better looking trophy wife
> > (or husband), but the Honda is a lot easier to fix. (Try finding an
> > affordable Ferrari mechanic in Stockton, California.)
> >
> > To tie this back into our original discussion, it seems like the
> > government should be choosing to drive a Honda Accord when it can,
> > instead of the Ferrari.
> >
> > I guess you'd really have to crunch the numbers and see if the savings
> > in bandwidth/disk space costs were really worth the compression savings
> > that result from a proprietary compression scheme ("wavelet black
> > magic").
> >
> > The problem with this is a lot of the benefits that come from the Honda
> > Accord (open image format + open compression algorithm) aren't easily
> > calculated in dollars and cents.
> >
> > Still, this speaks to an important truth I have discovered in open
> > source development: Simple is better, even when it isn't necessarily
> > faster and smaller.
> >
> > I'd rather have code that I can understand, or a file format that a
> > programmer in 20 years will understand, than a Ferrari you can't drive
> > unless you have a PHD and did a thesis on wavelet compression. :]
> >
> > Landon
> > Office Phone Number: (209) 946-0268
> > Cell Phone Number: (209) 992-0658
> >
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
> > [mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Paul Ramsey
> > Sent: Friday, August 21, 2009 10:36 AM
> > To: OSGeo Discussions
> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Open File
> > FormatsandProprietaryAlgorithms[SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
> >
> > So hung up on wavelets, we are.
> >
> > Internally tiled TIFF with JPEG compression and similarly formatted
> > internal overviews can achieve 10:1 compression rates without
> > noticeable image quality reductions, and as an added bonus can be
> > decompressed a heck of a lot faster than wavelet-based formats. The
> > wavelet stuff is k00l, in that there is no need for an overview
> > pyramid (it's implicit in the compression math) and much higher
> > compression rates can be achieved. But operationally, you can go a
> > long way with the more primitive (open image format + open compression
> > algorithm) approach.
> >
> > P.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> >
> > Warning:
> > Information provided via electronic media is not guaranteed against defects including translation and transmission
> errors. If the reader is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
> copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this information in error, please notify the
> sender immediately.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list