[OSGeo-Discuss] WMS Problems after MGOS 2.1 update

Bracco Stefano Stefano.Bracco at eurac.edu
Thu Dec 10 03:04:34 PST 2009


I have a layer linked to an internal WMS Service. After the MGOS server
update to version 2.1 the map is no longer worker.

Checking to the logs I have found the following error:

 

<2009-12-10T12:27:56>   -1363174512     Ajax Viewer     10.20.64.2
Administrator

 Error: Failed to stylize layer: Relief_WMS

        The coordinate system initialization failed.

        Could not initialize the geodetic transformation.

 StackTrace:

  - MgMappingUtil.StylizeLayers() line 776 file MappingUtil.cpp

 

Which, as explained by Jason, is due to the new adoption of the Mercator
Libraries in substitution of PROJ 4.

In fact in version 2.0.2 the map was working correctly without any
problem.

 

Now the problem is that the WMS system was serving the map with
projection set to EPSG:32632

 

I tried to set this parameter using Maestro, bust validating the EPSG
code is no longer working and it is not validated on the new version.

If I use the WKT notation:

 

PROJCS["WGS 84 / UTM zone 32N",GEOGCS["WGS
84",DATUM["WGS_1984",SPHEROID["WGS
84",6378137,298.257223563,AUTHORITY["EPSG","7030"]],AUTHORITY["EPSG","63
26"]],PRIMEM["Greenwich",0,AUTHORITY["EPSG","8901"]],UNIT["degree",0.017
45329251994328,AUTHORITY["EPSG","9122"]],AUTHORITY["EPSG","4326"]],UNIT[
"metre",1,AUTHORITY["EPSG","9001"]],PROJECTION["Transverse_Mercator"],PA
RAMETER["latitude_of_origin",0],PARAMETER["central_meridian",9],PARAMETE
R["scale_factor",0.9996],PARAMETER["false_easting",500000],PARAMETER["fa
lse_northing",0],AUTHORITY["EPSG","32632"],AXIS["Easting",EAST],AXIS["No
rthing",NORTH]]

 

Maestro seems to validate and the conversion is ok, but I still get the
same error.

 

Any idea how I could add the EPSG:32632 to the Mercator System, so that
the problem should be solved?

 

Many thanks for any help!

 

Stefano

 

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20091210/7535b4f5/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Discuss mailing list