[OSGeo-Discuss] role of foundation with regard to licensing
Tim Schaub
tschaub at opengeo.org
Wed Nov 18 18:13:43 PST 2009
Hey-
Frank Warmerdam wrote:
> Tim,
>
> The PSC is considered to be a committee of the foundation, and in
> particular
> it's representative is considered to be an officer of the foundation
> (corporation) giving them some ability to speak for the foundation legally.
>
Ok. I didn't get this from a read of
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Steering_Committees (the part about
consideration as a committee and PSC rep as officer of foundation).
I think this answers my question. I didn't know how formal the
arrangement was (or even needs to be).
> >> I imagine this would happen with some constraints from the
> foundation (e.g.
>>> OSI approved licenses only)
>>>
>>> I know that in practice, this is probably the way things already are.
>>> Why
>>> rock the boat? Why assign copyright to OSGeo in the first place [2]?
>
> The primary reason to assign copyright to OSGeo is to make it easier to
> relicense in the future. It is very hard to relicense a project with
> copyright
> held by many contributors.
Right. The reason I was asking was because I assumed the copyright
assignment was primarily about relicensing. Finding no information
specifically on how the foundation determines what license to use, I was
unsure how things would go in practice.
Sounds like the process goes like this (if OSGeo holds copyright):
1) PSC votes on license
2) PSC chair advises OSGeo board
3) OSGeo board decides on license
Perhaps all this seems obvious. As the chair of the OpenLayers PSC, I
was asking for clarification on the process because the PSC has been
discussing both copyright assignment and relicensing. I just wanted to
know who to talk to if/when we make any decisions. Sounds like the
OSGeo board.
Just added http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Licensing
All mushy language. If someone wants to firm it up (or delete it),
please do.
Thanks,
Tim
>
> There are also reasons not to assign license, foremost being the paperwork
> overhead involved in contributions agreements for all contributors. Some
> contributors are also hesitant to surrender their control over their
> contribution.
>
> Best regards,
--
Tim Schaub
OpenGeo - http://opengeo.org
Expert service straight from the developers.
More information about the Discuss
mailing list