[OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Board Election 2010

[Ravi]

Reactions are welcome. But what is
1.  anticipated from the candidates
2. cases where expected results are not coming forthwith
3. how the old candidates should have fared.. etc  etc

Will give more fodder to the discussion.

--- On Tue, 17/8/10, Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com> wrote:

From: Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo Board Election 2010
To: "OSGeo Discussions" <discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
Date: Tuesday, 17 August, 2010, 11:14 PM

Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
> Ah, sorry, I scanned the first couple too quickly then jumped to the end too
> fast.  But, still, there's little or nothing there from too many of the
> candidates.
> 
> By this metric, so far Daniel and Paolo get my votes...

Michael,

I certainly think this would be a great opportunity for folks to also
suggest some issues of interest to them.  Things that they would like
a reaction to from potential board members.

I did struggle a bit with what to put in my statement.  As an incumbent
it was not obvious to me that I have particular new issues to spearhead
in the coming years, though obviously I hope to continue with many existing
initiatives.

I am pleased to see a strong slate of candidates.

Best regards,
-- ---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
I set the clouds in motion - turn up   | Frank Warmerdam, warmerdam at pobox.com
light and sound - activate the windows | http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
and watch the world go round - Rush    | Geospatial Programmer for Rent

_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20100818/f933a64f/attachment-0002.html>