[OSGeo-Discuss] U.S. Department of Interior soliciting Ideas on improving business practices
Andrew Turner
ajturner at highearthorbit.com
Wed Mar 10 09:47:58 PST 2010
I would like to reiterate that value that the US Government is placing
on the IdeaScale comments. The number of comments, quality, feedback,
comments, etc. are all feeding into the internal discussions on policy
and acquisition. So feel free to comment directly there.
Also there is the FCC site up: http://rebootfcc.uservoice.com
Andrew
Doug_Newcomb at fws.gov wrote:
>
> Arnulf,
>
> Mind if I copy/paste your comments below into the comments section for
> that entry ?
> Doug
>
> Doug Newcomb
> USFWS
> Raleigh, NC
> 919-856-4520 ext. 14 doug_newcomb at fws.gov
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> The opinions I express are my own and are not representative of the
> official policy of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Dept. of the
> Interior. Life is too short for undocumented, proprietary data formats.
> Inactive hide details for "Arnulf Christl (OSGeo)"
> <arnulf at osgeo.org>"Arnulf Christl (OSGeo)" <arnulf at osgeo.org>
>
>
> *"Arnulf Christl (OSGeo)" <arnulf at osgeo.org>*
> Sent by: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org
>
> 03/10/2010 09:34 AM
> Please respond to
> arnulf at osgeo.org; Please respond to
> OSGeo Discussions <discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
>
>
>
> To
>
> "OSGeo Discussions" <discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
>
> cc
>
>
> Subject
>
> Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] U.S. Department of Interior soliciting Ideas on
> improving business practices
>
>
>
>
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> > The U.S Department of Interior has a website up soliciting
> ideas for
> > improvement. Each idea gives registered users options to comment and
> vote
> > on suggestions. There is a suggestion posted for the use of open
> source
> > software, and I have just posted a suggestion for regular
> benchmarking of
> > software ( commercial and open source) for OGC services and processing
> > large datasets ( comments welcome!) .
>
> Doug,
> thank you for this information.
>
> One minor clarification on terminology (I will never tire): Using the
> wording "commercial and open source" to differentiate proprietary form
> free/open license models is misguiding as all Open Source software can
> also be used in commercial contexts and is thus also "commercial
> software".
>
> This has recently been clarified by the US Department of Defense available
> in a document [1], attachment 2 on page 5, §2 a):
> "In almost all cases, OSS meets the definition of “commercial computer
> software” and shall be given appropriate statutory preference in
> accordance with 10 USC 2377 (reference (b)) (see also FAR 2.101(b),
> 12.000, 12.101 (reference (c)); and DFARS 212.212, and 252.227-7014(a)(1)
> (reference (d)))."
>
> (I love to cite those guys, they manage to make everything look dead
> serious :-)
>
> The correct term to differentiate free and open source license models from
> proprietary license is models is "proprietary", and nothing but.
>
> Best regards,
> Arnulf.
>
> [1] http://cio-nii.defense.gov/sites/oss/2009OSS.pdf
>
> > For those who might be interested in making suggestions or
> > commenting
> > on the existing suggestions, the website is:
> > http://openinterior.ideascale.com/
> >
> >
> > Doug
> >
> > Doug Newcomb
> > USFWS
> > Raleigh, NC
> > 919-856-4520 ext. 14 doug_newcomb at fws.gov
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > The opinions I express are my own and are not representative of the
> > official policy of the U.S.Fish and Wildlife Service or Dept. of the
> > Interior. Life is too short for undocumented, proprietary data
> > formats._______________________________________________
> > Discuss mailing list
> > Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> > http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
> --
> President OSGeo
> http://www.osgeo.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
--
Andrew Turner
m: 248.982.3609 e: andrew at highearthorbit.com t: @ajturner
b: http://highearthorbit.com w: http://geocommons.com
Introduction to Neogeography - http://oreilly.com/catalog/neogeography
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20100310/00dc235d/attachment-0002.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 105 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20100310/00dc235d/attachment-0004.gif>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: image/gif
Size: 45 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20100310/00dc235d/attachment-0005.gif>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list