[OSGeo-Discuss] ZOO-Project WPS Validity report

[Jody Garnett]

Well it is an interesting discussion; and it will be a very important area for all implementations to succeed with (if the vision of process chaining is to proceed). I am especially keen to see both client code appear; and also how the different implementations will act as "clients" when they are chaining the output from another WPS.

Indeed for WPS we finally have a specification which the server implementations are on the hook to write client code as well :-)

Jody


On 20/09/2010, at 7:57 PM, Gérald Fenoy wrote:

> Hi Jody, 
> thanks for your answer.
> 
> Indeed we wish to get blog posts about this specifically, I'm hopping than some of this mailing list readers will post on their own blog. Somebody from the ZOO-Discuss mailing list already post the content of the previous mail [1].
> 
> Hope to see more blog posts about this,
> best regards,
> 
> [1] http://3liz.com/blog/rldhont/index.php/2010/09/20/344-zoo-project-wps-validity-report
> 
> Le 20 sept. 2010 à 11:09, Jody Garnett a écrit :
> 
>> With respect to your testing of zoo - you may wish to pass this information on as a blog post so it shows up on osgeo planet along with the other foss4g summaries.
>> 
> 
> Gérald Fenoy
> ZOO PSC Chair
> gerald.fenoy at geolabs.fr
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20100920/c48bcdd9/attachment-0005.html>