[OSGeo-Discuss] 2011 Charter Member Election Results
nicolas bozon
nicolas.bozon at gmail.com
Fri Dec 2 21:20:32 PST 2011
Michael, all
Done -
The page was created here:
http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_charter_member_page_instruction
Thanks to all experienced members to add their thoughts there !
Best,
Nick
2011/12/3 Michael P. Gerlek <mpg at flaxen.com>
> Nicolas:****
>
> ** **
>
> This is a great idea. Could you please start by stubbing out a wiki page
> for this, and then others can add onto it?****
>
> ** **
>
> -mpg****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> *From:* discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:
> discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] *On Behalf Of *nicolas bozon
> *Sent:* Friday, December 02, 2011 6:56 PM
> *To:* OSGeo Discussions
> *Subject:* Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] 2011 Charter Member Election Results****
>
> ** **
>
> Hello all,
>
> As a fresh new charter member, i was precisely wondering if some
> guidelines for charter membership were available somewhere. I was about to
> ask in fact, when this thread came up.
> I knew that voting was one of the duties, but thought that some others may
> exist.
> According to me, charter members should also dynamise and promote their
> respective (and/or prefered) local chapter as much as possible.
> That would be nice if some experienced charter members could start such
> guidelines on the wiki or elsewhere where a kind of brainstorming could
> occur on that topic.
> My 2 cents
> Thanks
>
> Nick****
>
> 2011/12/3 Mateusz Ĺoskot <mateusz at loskot.net>****
>
> On 2 December 2011 16:30, Dave McIlhagga <dmcilhagga at dmsolutions.ca>
> wrote:
> > I would suggest that on the contrary, being a Charter Member does come
> with
> > responsibility -- it may be minimal but is critically important. All
> that is required is
> >voting for new Charter Members and voting for the Board.
> >
> > Assuming, reasonable efforts have been made to be in touch with Charter
> Members,
> > I think it's actually important to purge those who don't take this
> responsibility
> >seriously. I would suggest it's a necessary part of preserving the
> integrity of the organization.
> >
> > Keep in mind, for many OSGeo is not just a past-time - it's a vested
> > part of our institutions, businesses, and people.****
>
> I support Dave's opinion here.
>
> OSGeo has no resources for mothering its Charter Members.
>
> Best regards,
> --
> Mateusz Loskot, http://mateusz.loskot.net
> Charter Member of OSGeo, http://osgeo.org
> Member of ACCU, http://accu.org****
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss****
>
> ** **
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20111203/79586e4e/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list