[OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Fwd: Board elections Voting

[Michael P. Gerlek]

+1

I like the old way better too, but Daniel it right: the comment period is past.

-mpg


> -----Original Message-----
> From: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Daniel Morissette
> Sent: Wednesday, July 25, 2012 7:06 AM
> To: discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] Fwd: Board elections Voting
> 
> On 12-07-25 9:08 AM, Seven (aka Arnulf) wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for the link steko. For this election I suggest we stick with
> > what we have though, probably a little late to introduce this. But I
> > will add the whole elections topic to the next board meeting so that
> > we don't wake up late for the next elections again...
> >
> 
> I am with Arnulf on this: let's stick with what we have and revisit in
> time before the next election.
> 
> The current election schedule was proposed on June 14 [1] and
> discussed/edited for about a week until it was finally approved on June
> 21 [2], so there was time for members to comment if they wanted to (and
> some did if you look in the archives). I don't care one way or the other
> personally for the voting, but I do know that it's not possile to make
> everyone happy and I'm sure that for every charter member requesting a
> change we can find one that would find it inappropriate to change the
> rules in the middle of an election.
> 
> [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/2012-June/009714.html
> 
> [2] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/2012-June/009745.html
> 
> --
> Daniel Morissette
> http://www.mapgears.com/
> Provider of Professional MapServer Support since 2000
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss