[Board] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Defining an OSGeo Ambassador role

[Venkatesh Raghavan]

Michael,

On 2012/05/05 23:58, Michael P. Gerlek wrote:
> Your points have actually been discussed, but so far there hasn't apparently been enough interest to further push the idea of stronger charter member roles.
"enough interest" in the community or the OSGeo Board?
>
>
>
> (Your points (1) and (3) are already the case, and some people (myself included) feel that (2) is not desirable right now.)
About (2), why is it not desirable?

Venka
>
>
>
> -mpg
>
>
>
> From: board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org [mailto:board-bounces at lists.osgeo.org] On Behalf Of Venkatesh Raghavan
> Sent: Saturday, May 05, 2012 5:46 AM
> Cc: discuss at lists.osgeo.org; OSGeo-Board; marketing
> Subject: [Board] Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Defining an OSGeo Ambassador role
>
>
>
> There was a discussion about responsibility of Charter members
> http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/2011-December/009239.html
>
> and a wiki page (see below) was initiated (at the request of a Board member)
> but not much input after that.
> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_charter_member_page_instruction
>
> I also made several suggestions to the board which till date is answered by anyone
> on the OSGeo board.
> See thread http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/board/2012-January/009337.html
>
> Venka
>
>
>