[OSGeo-Discuss] OGC compliance of WMS client
Sebastian Goerke
goerke at lat-lon.de
Mon Apr 22 02:08:39 PDT 2013
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marco,
it should be. There is a requirement within the WMS specification that
defines "REQUEST=GetCapabilities" to be supported by a WMS Server. But
it is not forbidden to have support for "REQUEST=getcapabilities" on
the server side, too. For WMS clients, this means, requests shall use
"REQUEST=GetCapabilities" because this is the only typing defined
within the specification.
Regards
Sebastian
- --
l a t / l o n GmbH
Aennchenstrasse 19 53177 Bonn, Germany
phone ++49 +228 18496-0 fax ++49 +228 18496-29
http://www.lat-lon.de http://www.deegree.org
Am 22.04.2013 11:04, schrieb Marco Lechner - FOSSGIS e.V.:
> Hi,
>
> is a WMS-Client using "REQUEST=getcapabilities" instead of
> "REQUEST=GetCapabilities" still in compliance with OGC standard
> (VERSION1.1.1 as well as 1.3.0)? I don't think so, but I'm unsure.
>
> Marco
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with undefined - http://www.enigmail.net/
iEYEARECAAYFAlF0/hIACgkQq1hDh4aJykIovACgzJ2X2cEm1tSMhzIAOv1/Vhvl
SokAnjpnEhjRB7x2/DaEITMdfXI2NWUr
=8t+v
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Discuss
mailing list