[OSGeo-Discuss] FOSS4G 2013 Nottingham archiving

[Darrell Fuhriman]

The Cookbook,  Lessons Learned, and the recent 2013 summary have been  the most valuable for us.

The archive may have some value as a historical artifact, but that kind of higher level stuff is far more valuable. The day to day discussion threads simply do not matter.

And I'm with Steven, wikis suck as a project management tool. At best they're good as somewhat organized record of what was done (e.g. meeting notes). For actually getting work done, there are far better tools out there.

Darrell


On Dec 5, 2013, at 03:04, Steven Feldman <shfeldman at gmail.com> wrote:

> Jeff
> 
> You have raised the topic of our use of basecamp several times. I believe the LOC has the right and the need to choose the internal comms tool that works best for it. We chose basecamp and it worked well for us, much much better than dysfunctional mailing lists or a wiki. Those who follow on can make their own choices.
> 
> Re the archiving of logo file, discussions etc. We have committed to doing this and will deliver in a way that may be useful to others although I doubt that Portland or anyone following will ever look at this stuff, I know we never looked in the SVN at previous years' archives

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 4136 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20131205/522a728f/attachment-0002.bin>