[OSGeo-Discuss] ESRI, please publicly share reasons for given for adopting the GeoServices REST API
pcreso at pcreso.com
pcreso at pcreso.com
Thu May 9 00:38:56 PDT 2013
I note you say disappointed rather than surprised.
I agree, & if the contents are not made public, or at least provided to all paying OGC members & all voting OGC members, then I fail to see how the OGC can honestly claim the vote in any way reflects the preferences of its membership, rather than a vote by some members who were under some sort of pressure from a large multinational company.
--- On Thu, 5/9/13, Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at lisasoft.com> wrote:
From: Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at lisasoft.com>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] ESRI, please publicly share reasons for given for adopting the GeoServices REST API
To: "Craig Sandy" <CSandy at esriaustralia.com.au>
Cc: "OSGeo Discussions" <discuss at lists.osgeo.org>, tc-discuss at lists.opengeospatial.org, standards at lists.osgeo.org
Date: Thursday, May 9, 2013, 4:10 PM
I have been notified that ESRI/OGC will not be sharing reasons for voting for the "GeoServices REST API" that has been sent to OGC voting members.
I'm disappointed that such information is being with held from public debate.
On 8/05/2013 4:51 PM, Cameron Shorter wrote:
> I understand that ESRI has been emailing some OGC voting members reasons for approving the GeoServices REST API.
> I think it appropriate to have an open discussion, and hear both the pros and cons for adopting the GeoServices REST API.
> Could you please share your comments on a public email list so that the community has an opportunity to hear the other side of the argument.
-- Cameron Shorter
Software and Data Solutions Manager
Tel: +61 (0)2 8570 5050
Mob: +61 (0)419 142 254
Think Globally, Fix Locally
Geospatial & Data Solutions enhanced with Open Standards and Open Source
The contents of this email are confidential and may be subject to legal or professional privilege and copyright. No representation is made that this email is free of viruses or other defects. If you have received this communication in error, you may not copy or distribute any part of it or otherwise disclose its contents to anyone. Please advise the sender of your incorrect receipt of this correspondence.
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Discuss