[OSGeo-Discuss] time for inspire committee at osgeo?

Massimiliano Cannata massimiliano.cannata at supsi.ch
Wed May 15 06:39:15 PDT 2013

Hi jachym,
I Fully support this idea and I'm interested in participating... In fact, I
believe that Inspire compliance will be one of the major market requirement
in the next future... At least in Europe (that is a large slice of foss4g

 Il giorno 15/mag/2013 13:17, "Jachym Cepicky" <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>
ha scritto:

> Hi,
> I'm working on some presentation about OSGeo relationship to INSPIRE
> directive (some preliminary czech version of presentation, which should
> be presented at this years INSPIRE conference [1])
> And it came to my mind, that OSGeo does not have any body, related to
> While I agree, INSPIRE is mainly EU-only topic, I think, implementing
> INSPIRE has big market potential and software, which does not indicate
> support for INSPIRE is banned from to be used in public organizations in
> EU. I believe, also "rest of the world" can profit from changes,
> necessary to be implemented in EU.
> Therefore I would consider INSPIRE committee in OSGeo as important body,
> which would coordinate efforts of OSGeo projects towards INSPIRE, so
> that we could declare: OSGeo projects are INSPIRE ready or we are
> working on it.
> Any opinions to this? I'm personally usually against forming "yet
> another committee", but in this case, I do not see the topic to be
> covered and it really is important issue here.
> Jachym
> [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE_conference_2013-paper
> [2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/INSPIRE
> --
> Jachym Cepicky
> Help Service - Remote Sensing s.r.o.
> jachym.cepicky at gmail.com
> HS-RS: jachym at hsrs.cz http://bnhelp.cz
> http://les-ejk.cz
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130515/c6e41868/attachment-0002.html>

More information about the Discuss mailing list