[OSGeo-Discuss] [Board] RE : Re: OSGEO4W future

[Paolo Cavallini]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Il 22/09/2013 10:41, Daniel Morissette ha scritto:

> Personally I'd treat OSGeo4W as a software project, with a PSC, 
> committers, etc. We should do the same with OSGeo-Live actually,
> take it out of the Marketing committee and treat it as a sofware
> project which is what it si really is.
> 
> Then projects (OSGeo4W and OSGeo-Live) can apply for incubation
> when they are resdy, etc.

Hi Daniel,
I see two possibilities here:
* osgeo4w is an official foundation project, and as such it does not
need to apply for incubation (it would be circular reasoning); in this
case the PSC should be appointed by the foundation, or
* it is an independent project, thus following the usual procedure; in
this case, better not to use the osgeo4w name and logo, and let the
devs self organize.
Thoughts?
All the best.
- -- 
Paolo Cavallini - Faunalia
www.faunalia.eu
Full contact details at www.faunalia.eu/pc
Nuovi corsi QGIS e PostGIS: http://www.faunalia.it/calendario
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAlJAWYEACgkQ/NedwLUzIr5mowCfR7mK5Pc4ilRIiDFcNeVhoXg6
P1AAnjXOOrS223GxtOajjoxdARUD0h1M
=qzGS
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----