[OSGeo-Discuss] [osgeo4w-dev] [Board] RE : Re: OSGEO4W future

[Matt Wilkie]

The RFC looks good to me too. The process of introducing and passing 
proposals is straightforward, with a process for working through 
dispute, using methods that we've seen used successfully elsewhere.

I don't have anything to add, except perhaps a mention that 
adding/removing individual packages from the distribution doesn't 
/necessarily /need an RFC, but that it is good form to announce on the 
mailing list in advance of intention to do so.

cheers,

matt wilkie
--------------------------------------------
Geomatics Analyst
Information Management and Technology
Yukon Department of Environment
10 Burns Road * Whitehorse, Yukon * Y1A 4Y9
867-667-8133 Tel * 867-393-7003 Fax
http://environmentyukon.gov.yk.ca/geomatics/
--------------------------------------------

On 25/09/2013 3:34 PM, Tamas Szekeres wrote:
> Frank,
>
> The RFC <http://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo4w/wiki/rfc1_pmc> looks pretty 
> good, thanks for putting that together. Once the PSC is formed, I'm 
> keen on writing a second one where we could start thinking about the 
> primary objectives and requirements of the system we should realize, I 
> think we all have quite some ideas, and experiences in creating 
> windows builds (both positive and negative) which makes it possible to 
> find out the right direction to follow.
>
> I also think packaging on Windows is a different thing, other 
> platforms may apply for a separate governance regarding to the binary 
> distributions, there might be some common aspects, though.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Tamas
>
>
>
> 2013/9/25 Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam at pobox.com 
> <mailto:warmerdam at pobox.com>>
>
>     Folks,
>
>     I have initiated an RFC for a project management committee for
>     OSGeo4W.  I'd encourage everyone interested in participating to joint
>     the osgeo4w-dev mailing list and to continue detailed discussion
>     there.
>
>     http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/osgeo4w-dev
>
>     I think this list (osgeo-discuss) is a great place to discuss linkages
>     between different packaging efforts.
>
>     Best regards,
>     Frank
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20130926/0a696f3c/attachment-0002.html>