[OSGeo-Discuss] Fixing FOSS4G [SEC=UNOFFICIAL]

Bruce Bannerman B.Bannerman at bom.gov.au
Wed Sep 24 22:51:48 PDT 2014


Cameron,

I just re-read this wiki page.

Well done on collating this information in such a concise and thoughtful manner!

Bruce


From: Cameron Shorter <cameron.shorter at gmail.com<mailto:cameron.shorter at gmail.com>>
Date: Saturday, 20 September 2014 7:17
To: Discuss OSGeo <discuss at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>>
Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] Fixing FOSS4G

Dan,
You might want to look over the lessons learned from 2012. http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/FOSS4G_2012_Lessons_Learned
I respectfully disagree with Michael. I think that early support of the China FOSS4G could have steered the event to be a successful, although smaller event.

On 20/09/2014 5:47 am, Michael Gerlek wrote:
China would still have failed, but we would have known about it [and, hopefully, acted] sooner.

-mpg



On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 3:43 PM, Dan Ames <dan.ames at byu.edu<mailto:dan.ames at byu.edu>> wrote:
Again from the sidelines... It would be an interesting exercise to conceptualize how having a single professional conference organizing company would have/have not made a difference with the failed voyage of FOSS4G to China in 2012. - Dan

**********************************************************************
Daniel P. Ames, Ph.D., P.E.
Associate Professor, Civil & Environmental Engineering
Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah, USA





_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss


--
Cameron Shorter,
Software and Data Solutions Manager
LISAsoft
Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009

P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com<http://www.lisasoft.com>,  F +61 2 9009 5099
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20140925/3c558d69/attachment-0002.html>


More information about the Discuss mailing list