[OSGeo-Discuss] [Incubator] New incubation procedure

[Jachym Cepicky]

I would like to get some time and, as Cameron pointed out, try to rewrite
current incubation checklist between new proposed "star" system


than we can start to talk about it again

then we can agree on something

then we can use it :)

sounds easy, right?

thanks

J

Mon Feb 23 2015 at 22:05:36 odesílatel Landon Blake <
sunburned.surveyor at gmail.com> napsal:

> I agree we should revisit our incubation process and see how our former
> "OSGeo Labs" fits in to the overall incubation process. I'm willing to
> help. What is our next step?
>
> Landon
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Cameron Shorter <
> cameron.shorter at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>  Hi Jachym,
>> I think this is a good idea.
>>
>> Also to include in this discussion is streamlining our existing
>> incubation docs. In particular, retire "General Principles of Incubation"
>> [1], update  our Project Graduation Checklist [2], and update our Incubator
>> Application Questionnaire [3]. The links below include proposals for how
>> these docs could be updated.
>>
>> [1] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/General_Principles_of_Incubation
>> [2] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Project_Graduation_Checklist
>> [3] http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/Incubator_Application_Questionnaire
>>
>>
>> On 16/02/2015 10:44 pm, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>>  I would like to dig a bit more into the topic "more fine incubation"
>> procedure and former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly forgotten
>> in past, but you can find more at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs)
>>
>>  I would like to start talk about it a bit (I suggest incubator mailing
>> list), prepared wiki page (with confusing name):
>> http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/5-star-rating
>>
>>  Scope: to re-new OSGeo Labs, make the incubation process easier for all
>> of us, with more little steps (except for one big). Projects could flow
>> between the steps "up" and "down", related to their current living phase.
>>
>>  I hope, this would help to the community to get oriented, would allow
>> more projects to join in. Work for incubation committee and mentors could
>> be even less (some projects will remain in beta). It's also related to the
>> "certification" topic (even not people, but software).
>>
>>  Jachym
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing listDiscuss at lists.osgeo.orghttp://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>>
>>
>> --
>> Cameron Shorter,
>> Software and Data Solutions Manager
>> LISAsoft
>> Suite 112, Jones Bay Wharf,
>> 26 - 32 Pirrama Rd, Pyrmont NSW 2009
>>
>> P +61 2 9009 5000,  W www.lisasoft.com,  F +61 2 9009 5099
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Incubator mailing list
>> Incubator at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/incubator
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20150224/3702feea/attachment.html>