[OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure

[Jody Garnett]

I think we could Vaclav. One of the more extreme ideas I have had is to
just call it "incubation" and only assign mentors when a project has
completed each of the five things we expect and wants a review /
recommendation. It would free us up to take on more projects (no longer
bottle necked on mentors).

My big trouble with this whole thing is the basic one: I want a project to
be open source before being part of OSGeo :) So open source license and
code check is the first step (not the last step).

Perhaps we could allow projects to do automated/grep search for the initial
code check?

--
Jody Garnett

On 2 March 2015 at 09:32, Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com> wrote:

>
> On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jachym Cepicky <jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly forgotten in past, but
>> you can find more at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs)
>>
>
> Hi Jachym,
>
> do you think that with the renewal you can replace the name "OSGeo Labs"
> by something else? Now we have also ISPRS-ICA-OSGeo Research and
> Educational laboratories which might be often shortened to OSGeo Labs,
> although I prefer OSGeoRELs for writing. The mainling list is
> ica-osgeo-labs. Put perhaps it is not such an issue since the term "Geo for
> All" (http://www.geoforall.org/) is now used more and more (well, the
> linked website as OSGeo Labs in the title element).
>
> Thanks for taking this into consideration,
> Vaclav
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20150302/e7d77123/attachment-0002.html>