[OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure

Thu Mar 5 02:18:13 PST 2015

Guys,

I think you are trying to find a term for something, I would like to get
rid of. "OSGeo Project" is, what I would like to achieve for both - today's
projects and labs together under one hat.

Or anybody thinks completely different?

Just my $.02
J

čt 5. 3. 2015 v 9:08 odesílatel Suchith Anand <
Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk> napsal:

> Yes, i think "Incubator Projects" is an appropriate name for this.
>
> Vaclav - Is this ok for you?
>
> Suchith
> ________________________________________
> From: Bart van den Eijnden [bartvde at osgis.nl]
> Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 7:34 AM
> To: Vaclav Petras
> Cc: Suchith Anand; discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
>
> I agree Community Projects is a confusing name.
>
> What about incubator projects? That’s the term that Apache uses.
>
> http://incubator.apache.org
>
> Best regards,
> Bart
>
> On 04 Mar 2015, at 23:25, Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com<mailto:w
> enzeslaus at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Suchith Anand <
> Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk<mailto:Suchith.Anand at nottingham.ac.uk>>
> wrote:
> Thanks Jeff.
>
> Though we had lots of discussions afterwards and continuing on this , we
> couldnt find any solution till now. So this might be a good opportunity  to
> modify the Incubation's "labs" term, to something like "Community Projects"
> to avoid confusion if that is acceptable to Vaclav, Jachym and others. Many
> thanks.
>
> Well, I'm not particularly fond of "Community Projects" as a name. Even
> mature FOSS projects are community projects in one way or the other.
> Unfortunately, I don't have other suggestion.
>
> Vaclav
>
> Suchith
>
> ________________________________________
> From: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss-bounces@
> lists.osgeo.org> [discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss-bounces@
> lists.osgeo.org>] On Behalf Of Jeff McKenna [jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com
> <mailto:jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com>]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 2:26 PM
> To: discuss at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
>
> (we are approaching 2 full years that this "labs" naming has been an
> issue and discussed[1])
>
> Today, knowing how ingrained the term 'lab' is in the GeoForAll
> education network, maybe Jachym is correct that it is a good time to
> modify the Incubation's "labs" term, to something like "Community
> Projects".
>
> [1] http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/ica-osgeo-labs/2013-June/000134.html
>
> -jeff
>
>
>
>
> On 2015-03-03 3:42 AM, Suchith Anand wrote:
> > Vaclav,
> >
> > Please accept my sincere apologies as it was my mistake that i did not
> think on this  when we started the ICA-OSGeo Labs initiative (so many
> things were going on at that time!).
> >
> > In universities, we generally use the "Labs" term to refer to
> infrastructure/people/facilities for a particular subject. For example
> Botany Lab, Robotics Lab etc. And we wanted to make sure there is a
> dedicated Open Source Geospatial Lab in universities worldwide  (which
> includes bringing together people from various disciplines, infrastructure
> (the physical space) and facilities to make this happen. Also it is easier
> to make use of the same terminology/structure of "Labs" which is widely
> used in the university environment to get academics start the initiative in
> their respective universities (also it is easier for them to convince their
> higher management on a structure that is known to them than reinvent a new
> term for this) .
> >
> > So it will very helpful for us if you can make use of new
> "OSGeo-projects" and metioned star (or similar) rating system for the
> incubation as then there is no confusion in the future. Many thanks for
> your consideration.
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Suchith
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss-bounces@
> lists.osgeo.org> [discuss-bounces at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:discuss-bounces@
> lists.osgeo.org>] On Behalf Of Jachym Cepicky [jachym.cepicky at gmail.com<
> mailto:jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>]
> > Sent: Tuesday, March 03, 2015 7:27 AM
> > To: Vaclav Petras
> > Cc: OSGeo Discussions; incubator at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:
> incubator at lists.osgeo.org>
> > Subject: Re: [OSGeo-Discuss] New incubation procedure
> >
> > Vašku,
> >
> > just side note: yes, whith the new "Labs" initiative "OSGeo-Labs" have
> to change their name.
> >
> > My idea would rather be to get rid of current OSGeo- "labs" and
> "projects" and start with new "OSGeo-projects" and metioned star (or
> similar) rating system.
> >
> > Than for current OSGeo-Labs "OSGeo-project level 1" would make it (or
> similar)
> >
> > Jachym
> >
> > po 2. 3. 2015 v 18:33 odesílatel Vaclav Petras <wenzeslaus at gmail.com
> <mailto:wenzeslaus at gmail.com><mailto:wenzeslaus at gmail.com<mailto:wenz
> eslaus at gmail.com>>> napsal:
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 6:44 AM, Jachym Cepicky <
> jachym.cepicky at gmail.com<mailto:jachym.cepicky at gmail.com><mailto:
> jachym.cepicky at gmail.com<mailto:jachym.cepicky at gmail.com>>> wrote:
> > former "OSGeo Labs" (now it has no name is slowly forgotten in past, but
> you can find more at http://wiki.osgeo.org/wiki/OSGeo_Labs)
> >
> > Hi Jachym,
> >
> > do you think that with the renewal you can replace the name "OSGeo Labs"
> by something else? Now we have also ISPRS-ICA-OSGeo Research and
> Educational laboratories which might be often shortened to OSGeo Labs,
> although I prefer OSGeoRELs for writing. The mainling list is
> ica-osgeo-labs. Put perhaps it is not such an issue since the term "Geo for
> All" (http://www.geoforall.org/) is now used more and more (well, the
> linked website as OSGeo Labs in the title element).
> >
> > Thanks for taking this into consideration,
> > Vaclav
> >
> >
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
>
> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org<mailto:Discuss at lists.osgeo.org>
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
>
>
>
> This message and any attachment are intended solely for the addressee
> and may contain confidential information. If you have received this
> message in error, please send it back to me, and immediately delete it.
>
> Please do not use, copy or disclose the information contained in this
> message or in any attachment.  Any views or opinions expressed by the
> author of this email do not necessarily reflect the views of the
> University of Nottingham.
>
> This message has been checked for viruses but the contents of an
> attachment may still contain software viruses which could damage your
> computer system, you are advised to perform your own checks. Email
> communications with the University of Nottingham may be monitored as
> permitted by UK legislation.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss mailing list
> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20150305/bb2a446c/attachment-0002.html>