[OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo/LocationTech relationship

Daniel Kastl daniel at georepublic.de
Sun Nov 15 14:20:52 PST 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256


> 
> People can and do participate in both OSGeo & LocationTech all the 
> time.  This is a good thing. It absolutely isn't a zero sum
> scenario. The mutually reinforce each other rather than detract
> from one another.
> 

I think there is a big difference in how the participation is organized:
With OSGeo you become a member like this: http://www.osgeo.org/Membershi
p
And with LT it works like this:
https://www.locationtech.org/content/become-member and details in
here: https://www.locationtech.org/charter

You could now argue, that participation is not membership. That's right.
But then look at who you participate for in case of LT :
https://www.locationtech.org/members

There is a big "Strategic" at the topic, so to me this means, that
they have a lot to say. And there is a guest sections, which it likely
the opposite.

I don't need to explain, who paid their dollars to become a strategic
member. For them the annual fee is nothing in their overall budget.

The funny thing is, that both (OSGeo and LT) have a "Nondiscrimination
Statement" on their website:

OSGeo: "The Foundation is open to all members of the geospatial
community. We do not discriminate based on age, gender, race,
nationality, religion, sexual orientation, or disability."

LT: "We are committed to making participation in the LocationTech
community a harassment-free experience for everyone, regardless of
level of experience, gender, gender identity and expression, sexual
orientation, disability, personal appearance, body size, race,
ethnicity, age, religion or analogous grounds."

I think you forgot "economic discrimination"!

For me, whether I would be able to pay for a membership or not, it
makes it a very easy decision, where I want to contribute my volunteer
time for.

Sorry, if this slightly moved the thread into a different direction. I
just wanted to agree with Andrea, that LT doesn't have the same goals
in some way: it clearly focuses on the economic strong members of the
organization.

Best regards,
Daniel

PS: you will also recognize from the members, that LT is not a diverse
organization in terms nationalities. Well, you could argue, that IBM,
Oracle and Google are operating globally ;-)




- -- 
Georepublic UG & Georepublic Japan
eMail: daniel.kastl at georepublic.de
Web: https://georepublic.info
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWSQVEAAoJEHjh5kk/zBG09qAH/ih/Dw0EPTePboROuR/nH+Oj
oj3SWCkcZsacgG/WmvnGtBUU5hkikz9D/jDHYqD78Goaes6IpcxZQIvsP0R5KfEG
GSagqRXhJfEkC9dZr9d1RMWtR50t7TzUixCfJ1vubYkY7pg5ARUIYgMQ1OnL6H+t
DZS/Z/KEv1M7mWTkei+MHEzgKHzhNGnDFydbruMJyhr8hu8gI3MDD1Clfu9wxfVI
fgdqwZ9mU2X5gKwWwTGp6ZumzTpSbXGP86qmhubkQCEZonkRKaDb8ascH4l5teQL
//NaMXpgU8XCkdjt8ImCBdKjjjfUOc2dXFM52JZz6Z51j/73a6lF1Ijb2fSOQYw=
=tDh+
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the Discuss mailing list