[OSGeo-Discuss] OSGeo is becoming irrelevant. Here's why. Let's fix it.

[Sandro Santilli]

Given we already have trac, may I suggest to try at just improving it
to allow for storing code in a git repository, wherever it is ?

I understand there's a plugin to allow for that, did anyone try it ?

Speaking about projects demand, here's a list of tickets about
trac (many of which being enhancement requests):
https://trac.osgeo.org/osgeo/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&component=Systems+Admin&summary=~trac&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=type&col=priority&col=milestone&col=component&order=priority

There are 18 of them, oldest of which is from 8 years ago, and newer
is from 5 months ago. If there's not enough power for managing trac,
will there really be enough to manage a new service ?

--strk;


On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 01:20:46PM +0200, Bart van den Eijnden wrote:
> Before going to this trouble, we should check if there is an actual demand among projects?
> 
> Best regards,
> Bart
> 
> > On 01 Oct 2015, at 13:17, Jeff McKenna <jmckenna at gatewaygeomatics.com> wrote:
> > 
> > On 2015-10-01 4:18 AM, Jachym Cepicky wrote:
> >> I'm using gitlab already and it really gives you what I like on github
> >> 
> >> Shall we ask the board and SAC for create instance of gitlab on our servers?
> >> 
> >> J
> >> 
> > 
> > I think asking SAC about hosting GitLab on our servers is a great idea!  A nice option for projects.
> > 
> > -jeff