[OSGeo-Discuss] code of conduct: another real case

[Alex Mandel]

This might just be an accidental bit of confusion. At some point the
Marketing and Outreach committee did want to make sure that all OSGeo
projects had listings on OpenHub because we pull these stats into
OSGeo-Live and other materials. We also wanted all OSGeo projects to
show up if someone looked at the OSGeo org (this is a way to market the
projects).

I don't think we ever intended to misrepresent who owns the copyrights,
trademarks, etc...

Looking at the page I don't see Owner as a field. I only see
Organization and I'm not clear if a project can be part of more than 1 Org.

This seems like something we can easily resolve. Are you asking us to
remove the Organization link? Please state exactly what you expect us to
fix.

Thanks,
Alex



On 09/18/2015 01:26 AM, Peter Baumann wrote:
> Hi Jeff,
> 
> no problem: on the OpenHub page for rasdaman, OSGeo is listed as owner. This is
> misinformation, owner is rasdaman GmbH.
> You are right, this upsets me, and I am requesting that OSGeo restores the real
> owner immediately.
> 
> -Peter
> 
> 
> 
> On 2015-09-17 22:56, Jeff McKenna wrote:
>> Hi Peter,
>>
>> It may be early here at FOSS4G-Seoul, but I am finding it hard to understand
>> your full issue.  Can you please explain here to everyone what you mean by "I
>> found that OSGeo has claimed rasdaman at some
>> time in the past".  Claimed how/where/in what way?  As far as I know, rasdaman
>> is an OSGeo Project in Incubation, and, having been at the OSGeo booth here
>> most of this week I have spoken to many people coming to the booth about
>> rasdaman.  So, pardon me if I am in the total dark here, maybe you could
>> explain more to everyone, as I sense that you are upset.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> -jeff
>>
>>
>>
>> On 2015-09-18 1:21 AM, Peter Baumann wrote:
>>> Hello community,
>>>
>>> here is another real case that I would like to raise.
>>>
>>> rasdaman [0] is listed on OpenHub [1], like many of us, with owner rasdaman GmbH
>>> set originally. By coincidence I found that OSGeo has claimed rasdaman at some
>>> time in the past.
>>>
>>> To my total surprise, as rasdaman is in incubation since about 5 years now [2],
>>> and since quite some time OSGeo refuses graduation requiring this and that extra
>>> documentation.
>>>
>>> I find this undercover misappropriation a gross violation of professional ethics
>>> and request to immediately "give back" the project as a remedial action. I could
>>> do it myself, but recently OpenHub requires a phone number to be entered to
>>> which, as blog comments show, spam will get sent. IMO it is on OSGeo to bring
>>> this sacrifice.
>>>
>>> Actually, I know who has "stolen ownership", but will not disclose identity
>>> publicly following suggested practice.
>>>
>>> Rather, I am seeking contact to and investigation by the CoC Committee (or
>>> whoever is in charge).
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Peter
>>>
>>> [0] http://www.rasdaman.org
>>> [1] https://www.openhub.net/p/rasdaman
>>> [2] http://rasdaman.org/wiki/OSGeo
>>>
>>> PS: On the side, this IMHO justifies an amendment of the CoC rules to prevent
>>> such a case in future.
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss mailing list
>> Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
>> http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
>