[OSGeo-Discuss] Question(s) for board candidates

[Jeff McKenna]

For the record, the OSGeo Board was not involved in the FOSS4G video 
debate (most of those 47 messages were at the OSGeo Conference Committee 
level, where they should happen); I saw that and quickly motioned to the 
Board to approve, so the Conference Committee can move on.  The board 
quickly voted and agreed to let the Conference Committee decide a proper 
method for future years.

-jeff



On 2015-09-26 10:30 AM, Gert-Jan van der Weijden - Stichting OSGeo.nl wrote:
> Good to see we have this election wave going.
> @Michael, I'd bet you would be a good discussion moderator for an election debate at FOSS4G 2016 !
> Of course this all closely related to an other thread that are going on ("osgeo is becoming irrelevant")
>
>
> I'd like to ask our board candidates what their opinion is on the current relationship between the Board and the OSGeo-committees.
> In order to make it easier my observation: I get the impression that the Board spends much time on practical issues (such as the 47 mails regarding the 200 dollar grant for a Vimeo Pro account) which easily could be delegated to committees. (finance, website, marketing, conference etc.). Thus the Board can concentrate on more strategical matters (and keep an eye on the progress in the committees)
>
>
> Regards,
>
> GJ
>
> ps. 32 hours until the closure of the ballot-boxes...
>
>