[OSGeo-Discuss] how did the Paris code sprint go
Jonathan Moules
jonathan-lists at lightpear.com
Tue Mar 8 07:46:10 PST 2016
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/strawman
---- On Tue, 08 Mar 2016 15:01:19 +0000 Daniel Morissette<dmorissette at mapgears.com> wrote ----
On 2016-03-08 8:37 AM, Jonathan Moules wrote:
>
> Looking at the participant list, that Paris code-sprint entailed at
> least 10 transatlantic flights and probably at least that many
> short-haul (pan-Europe) flights too (which have higher emissions
> profiles per passenger mile). I don't doubt a lot of useful work was
> done, but was the quantity and quality of the work so much superior to
> the normal-work-from-home/office option that it was worth the
> considerable extra pollution that the sprint generated?
>
> This is obviously not something that can be easily quantified (although
> I'm sure a few PhD's are trying), but I believe it should be considered
> when these sorts of events are sponsored. Otherwise you can easily end
> up with a Tragedy of the Commons situation.
> A quick search doesn't find any sort of
> ethical/green/social-responsibility policy on OSGeo's pages...
>
Um... very good point. On that note, I wonder if we should consider
canceling the international FOSS4G which has an even worse impact since
we're talking of hundreds of useless flights only to get people to watch
a couple of conferences and share their latest project news.
Conferences and meetings could be streamed and delivered using hangouts
after all. Why did we not think of that before?
--
Daniel Morissette
http://www.mapgears.com/
T: +1 418-696-5056 #201
http://evouala.com/ - Location Intelligence Made Easy
_______________________________________________
Discuss mailing list
Discuss at lists.osgeo.org
http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.osgeo.org/pipermail/discuss/attachments/20160308/354d86c2/attachment-0002.html>
More information about the Discuss
mailing list